Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729984›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2016

Augmented renal clearance in Japanese intensive care unit patients: a prospective study.

Yasumasa Kawano, Shinichi Morimoto, Yoshito Izutani, Kentaro Muranishi, Hironari Kaneyama, Kota Hoshino, Takeshi Nishida, Hiroyasu Ishikura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yasumasa KawanoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.
Shinichi MorimotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.
Yoshito IzutaniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.
Kentaro MuranishiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.
Hironari KaneyamaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.
Kota HoshinoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.
Takeshi NishidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.
Hiroyasu IshikuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 8140180 Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAugmented renal clearance (ARC) of circulating solutes and drugs has been recently often reported in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, only few studies on ARC have been reported in Japan. The aims of this pilot study were to determine the prevalence and risk factors for ARC in Japanese ICU patients with normal serum creatinine levels and to evaluate the association between ARC and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the Japanese equation.

methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study from May 2015 to April 2016 at the emergency ICU of a tertiary university hospital; 111 patients were enrolled (mean age, 67 years; interquartile range, 53-77 years). We measured 8-h creatinine clearance (CL

resultsIn total, 43 patients (38.7 %) manifested ARC. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for age, body weight, body height, history of diabetes mellitus, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, admission categories of post-operative patients without sepsis and trauma, and serum albumin, and only age was identified as an independent risk factor for ARC (odds ratio, 0.95; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.98). Moreover, the AUROC of ARC for age and eGFR was 0.81 (95 % CI, 0.72-0.89) and 0.81 (95 % CI, 0.73-0.89), respectively. The optimal cutoff values for detecting ARC were age and eGFR of ≤63 years (sensitivity, 72.1 %; specificity, 82.4 %) and ≥76 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionsARC is common in Japanese ICU patients, and age was an independent risk factor for ARC. In addition, age and eGFR calculated using the Japanese equation were suggested to be useful screening tools for identifying Japanese patients with ARC.

Indexed as

Augmented renal clearanceeGFRIntensive care unitJapanRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID27729984
PMCPMC5048448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.