Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729970›Full record

ReviewFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2015

Improving systemic breast cancer therapy: time to look beyond the primary tumour?

E Vandendriessche, G Van De Putte, R Van Den Broecke, Etm De Jonge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E VandendriesscheDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Campus St. Jan, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
G Van De PutteDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Campus St. Jan, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium.
R Van Den BroeckeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Etm De JongeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Campus St. Jan, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIntra and inter tumour heterogeneity is a known feature in cancer because tumour cells undergo changes at genetic and epigenetic level as they spread from their primary tumour site. Adjuvant treatment protocols in breast cancer are currently based on the biological characteristics of the primary tumour, which in most cases has been removed surgically. Considering tumour heterogeneity in metastases we examined the present status of knowledge regarding measurable differences in tumour profiling between the primary breast tumour and its synchronous axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) and if so whether adjuvant therapy directed towards the tumour characteristics of the ALNM instead of those of the primary tumour is more effective.

methodsWe performed a literature search in Pubmed with the following MeSH headings: HUMAN and BREAST NEOPLASMS and RECEPTORS and ErbB-2.

resultsA significant change in tumour features was seen in metachronous metastases. In contrast, a high concordance of biomarker expression was reported between a primary breast tumour and its synchronous ALNM.

conclusionTumour heterogeneity is a challenge for targeted therapy. A poor response can be explained by the diversity of tumour cells. The biological profile of synchronous ALNM measured by oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and her-2-neu receptor status does not differ from the primary breast tumour and is not predictive of the tumour profile in metachronous metastasis. New techniques, such as profiling of circulating tumour cells or tumour behaviour in xenografts, are promising in directing more effective adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Biomarkerbreast cancerbreast neoplasmsmetastasesoestrogen receptorsprogesterone receptors

Identifiers

PMID27729970
PMCPMC5058414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.