Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729939›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2016

Is blue dye still required during sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer?

Mirjam Cl Peek, Tibor Kovacs, Rose Baker, Hisham Hamed, Ash Kothari, Michael Douek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mirjam Cl PeekDivision of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK; Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Tibor KovacsGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Rose BakerSchool of Business, 612, Maxwell Bldg, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK.
Hisham HamedGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Ash KothariGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Michael DouekDivision of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK; Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn early breast cancer, the optimal technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the combined technique (radioisotope and Patent Blue V) which achieves high identification rates. Despite this, many centres have decided to stop using blue dye due to blue-dye-related complications (tattoo, anaphylaxis). We evaluated the SLNB identification rate using the combined technique with and without Patent Blue V and the blue-dye-related complication rates.

methodsClinical and histological data were analysed on patients undergoing SLNB between March 2014 and April 2015. SLNB was performed following standard hospital protocols using the combined technique.

resultsA total of 208 patients underwent SLNB and 160 patients (342 nodes) with complete operation notes were available for final analysis. The identification rate with the combined technique was 98.8% (

conclusionThe combined technique should continue be the preferred technique for SLNB and should be standardised. Radioisotope alone (but not blue dye alone) has comparable sentinel node identification rates in experienced hands. National guidelines are required to optimise operative documentation.

Indexed as

breast cancerpatent blueradioisotopesentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID27729939
PMCPMC5045297
OpenAlexW2523662366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.