ReviewMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2016
Fortune telling: metabolic markers of plant performance.
Review in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of phenotypic trait plasticity in the oilseed Camelina sativa using integrated early stage abiotic stress and field studies.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Integrating metabolomics and high-throughput phenotyping to elucidate metabolic and phenotypic responses to early-season drought stress in Nordic spring wheat.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Advances in multi-trait genomic prediction approaches: classification, comparative analysis, and perspectives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Non-targeted metabolomics reveals fatty acid and associated pathways driving resistance to whitefly and tomato leafminer in wild tomato accessions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing multi-omics approaches to combat Karnal bunt of wheat: a review of advances and future prospects.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Dynamic relationships among pathways producing hydrocarbons and fatty acids of maize silk cuticular waxes.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- Plant biomarkers as early detection tools in stress management in food crops: a review.Planta · 2024Review
- Multi-omics assists genomic prediction of maize yield with machine learning approaches.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024Article
- Plant Metabolomics: Current Initiatives and Future Prospects.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Can plant hormonomics be built on simple analysis? A review.Plant methods · 2023Review
- Carbohydrate metabolism enzymes and phenotypic characterization of diverse lines of the climate-resilient food, feed, and bioenergy cropFood and energy security · 2023Article
- Prospects of advanced metagenomics and meta-omics in the investigation of phytomicrobiome to forecast beneficial and pathogenic response.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Morpho-physiological and biochemical responses of cotton (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022Article
- A comparative analysis of genomic and phenomic predictions of growth-related traits in 3-way coffee hybrids.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Review
- Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Article
- How do plants defend themselves against pathogens-Biochemical mechanisms and genetic interventions.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022Review
- Breeding for Economically and Environmentally Sustainable Wheat Varieties: An Integrated Approach from Genomics to Selection.Biology · 2022Review
- Does phenotyping ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Phenomic Selection: A New and Efficient Alternative to Genomic Selection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the last decade, metabolomics has emerged as a powerful diagnostic and predictive tool in many branches of science. Researchers in microbes, animal, food, medical and plant science have generated a large number of targeted or non-targeted metabolic profiles by using a vast array of analytical methods (GC-MS, LC-MS, AIM OF REVIEW: (i) To provide a definition of plant performance and metabolic markers, (ii) to highlight recent key applications involving metabolic markers as tools for monitoring or predicting plant performance, and (iii) to propose a workable and cost-efficient pipeline to generate and use metabolic markers with a special focus on plant breeding. KEY MESSAGE: Using examples in other models and domains, the review proposes that metabolic markers are tending to complement and possibly replace traditional molecular markers in plant science as efficient estimators of performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.