ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2016
Legal and ethical issues in research.
Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical Considerations in Oncology and Palliative Care Research During COVID-19.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursingTrial
- Development and Exploratory Validation of the Assisting Mealtime Scale for Dementia Care: Nursing Staff Perspectives on Mealtime Support.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Adaptation and validation of the Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire among Chinese international students in Malaysian higher education.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Exploring the association between melatonin and nicotine dependence (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Does positive feedback or appraisal about medical providers increase patients' trust and lead to better treatment outcomes? A double-blind randomized control trial.Journal of physical therapy science · 2023Article
- Collaboration in the formulation and implementation of policies for noncommunicable diseases in South Africa.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2023Article
- Using digitally mediated methods in sensitive contexts: a threat analysis and critical reflection on data security, privacy, and ethical concerns in the case of Afghanistan.Zeitschrift fur Friedens- und Konfliktforschung · 2022Article
- Experimental study of expression profile and specific role of human microRNAs in regulating atrophic bone nonunion.Medicine · 2020Observational
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Materials and Methods.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Review
- Factors Influencing Participation Of Healthy Volunteers In Clinical Trials: Findings From A Cross-Sectional Study In Delhi, North India.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Article
- Updated Editorial Guidance for Quality and Reliability of Research Output.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Article
- Determinants of Successful eHealth Coaching for Consumer Lifestyle Changes: Qualitative Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Drivers for successful long-term lifestyle change, the role of e-health: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Methodology for research II.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2016Review
- Selecting a thesis topic: A postgraduate's dilemma.Industrial psychiatry journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Legal and ethical issues form an important component of modern research, related to the subject and researcher. This article seeks to briefly review the various international guidelines and regulations that exist on issues related to informed consent, confidentiality, providing incentives and various forms of research misconduct. Relevant original publications (The Declaration of Helsinki, Belmont Report, Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences/World Health Organisation International Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, World Association of Medical Editors Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, CoSE White Paper, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use-Good Clinical Practice) form the literature that are relevant to the ethical and legal aspects of conducting research that researchers should abide by when conducting translational and clinical research. Researchers should note the major international guidelines and regional differences in legislation. Hence, specific ethical advice should be sought at local Ethics Review Committees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.