ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2016
Preparing manuscript: Scientific writing for publication.
Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Science and art of writing the title of systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Message by the Honorary Secretary Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists (ISA) National.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- A well-formulated research question: The foundation stone of good research.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- The increasing trend of observational studies in clinical research: Have we forgotten and started defying the hierarchy?Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
- Editing from the dungeons of the pandemic; an editor's agonisingly painful battle with COVID-19.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- SciPub-019-Getting Your Article Published in Scientific Journals- an Event Report.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Vision, mission and formulation of newer approaches and goals at IJA: The scientific journey will continue.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- Pathophysiology of a scientific paper.Saudi journal of anaesthesia · 2019Review
- Anatomy and physiology of a scientific paper.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2018Review
- Good practices of publishing AYUSH research: A practical checklist for authors.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Publication has become a burning issue among Indian medical fraternity owing to certain academic and professional necessities. The large number of submissions to the anaesthesia journals has resulted in accumulation of too much below average scientific material. A properly written manuscript is the dream of every editor and reviewer. The art of preparing a manuscript can be acquired only by following certain basic rules and technical aspects, besides knowledge and skills. Before preparing the manuscript, a target journal should be considered. All the instructions to the authors pertaining to that particular journal should be followed meticulously before preparing the manuscript for submission. The basic structure of the manuscript to be followed can be summarised by the acronym IMRaD (introduction, methods, results and discussion). The current review article aims to highlight all those mandatory and desirable features which should be kept in consideration while preparing a scientific manuscript for publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.