ReviewIndian journal of anaesthesia2016
Types of studies and research design.
Review in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06166381 (Parenteral Versus Combined Parenteral With Vancomycin-soaked Graft in Decreasing the Risk of Infection in ACL Reconstruction Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Parenteral Versus Combined Parenteral With Vancomycin-soaked Graft in Decreasing the Risk of Infection in ACL Reconstruction Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Lycopene Intake on the Fasting Blood Glucose Level: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Post-surgical diets in the ERAS protocol: D-ERAS scoping review.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Executive functions in adults: scoping review of computerized neuropsychological batteries.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2026Review
- Pharmacological Interventions for Excoriation Behaviors in Alzheimer's Disease: An Empty Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025Review
- A Mixed Scoping and Narrative Review of Immersive Technologies Applied to Patients for Pain, Anxiety, and Distress in Radiology and Radiotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Patient Positioning and Treatment Techniques in Total Skin Irradiation: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Academic writing in medicine and healthcare.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Assessment of Herd, Calf, and Colostrum Management Practices on Austrian Dairy Farms Using a Scoring System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Evidence of validity and reliability of the environmental action scale in Peruvian university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Dissertation writing in post graduate medical education.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- How is COVID-19 perceived by medical students? A survey in Aceh province, Indonesia.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2021Article
- Role of pharmacist during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021Article
- Nursing Personnel in the Era of Personalized Healthcare in Clinical Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- Medical Research in India: Let Us Plug the Holes!Journal of mid-life healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical research has evolved, from individual expert described opinions and techniques, to scientifically designed methodology-based studies. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) was established to re-evaluate medical facts and remove various myths in clinical practice. Research methodology is now protocol based with predefined steps. Studies were classified based on the method of collection and evaluation of data. Clinical study methodology now needs to comply to strict ethical, moral, truth, and transparency standards, ensuring that no conflict of interest is involved. A medical research pyramid has been designed to grade the quality of evidence and help physicians determine the value of the research. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have become gold standards for quality research. EBM now scales systemic reviews and meta-analyses at a level higher than RCTs to overcome deficiencies in the randomised trials due to errors in methodology and analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.