Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729520›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Simultaneous identification of specifically interacting paralogs and interprotein contacts by direct coupling analysis.

Thomas Gueudré, Carlo Baldassi, Marco Zamparo, Martin Weigt, Andrea Pagnani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pairing interacting protein sequences using masked language modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. CISD3/MiNT is required for complex I function, mitochondrial integrity, and skeletal muscle maintenance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas GueudréDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.
Carlo BaldassiDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy; Human Genetics Foundation, Molecular Biotechnology Center, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-8388
Marco ZamparoDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.
Martin WeigtSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, CNRS, Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, 75005 Paris, France andrea.pagnani@polito.it martin.weigt@upmc.fr.
Andrea PagnaniDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy; Human Genetics Foundation, Molecular Biotechnology Center, 10126 Torino, Italy; andrea.pagnani@polito.it martin.weigt@upmc.fr.

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding protein-protein interactions is central to our understanding of almost all complex biological processes. Computational tools exploiting rapidly growing genomic databases to characterize protein-protein interactions are urgently needed. Such methods should connect multiple scales from evolutionary conserved interactions between families of homologous proteins, over the identification of specifically interacting proteins in the case of multiple paralogs inside a species, down to the prediction of residues being in physical contact across interaction interfaces. Statistical inference methods detecting residue-residue coevolution have recently triggered considerable progress in using sequence data for quaternary protein structure prediction; they require, however, large joint alignments of homologous protein pairs known to interact. The generation of such alignments is a complex computational task on its own; application of coevolutionary modeling has, in turn, been restricted to proteins without paralogs, or to bacterial systems with the corresponding coding genes being colocalized in operons. Here we show that the direct coupling analysis of residue coevolution can be extended to connect the different scales, and simultaneously to match interacting paralogs, to identify interprotein residue-residue contacts and to discriminate interacting from noninteracting families in a multiprotein system. Our results extend the potential applications of coevolutionary analysis far beyond cases treatable so far.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProtein Interaction MappingAlgorithmsBiophysical PhenomenaComputational BiologyProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Amino AcidProteinscoevolutiondirect coupling analysisparalog matchingprotein−protein interaction networksstatistical inference

Identifiers

PMID27729520
PMCPMC5087065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.