Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729505›Full record

ArticlemBio2016

Peptidoglycan Recycling in Gram-Positive Bacteria Is Crucial for Survival in Stationary Phase.

Marina Borisova, Rosmarie Gaupp, Amanda Duckworth, Alexander Schneider, Désirée Dalügge, Maraike Mühleck, Denise Deubel, Sandra Unsleber, Wenqi Yu, Günther Muth and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. NagX, a periplasmic β-Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Obtaining Muramic Acid fromLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Systems-wide analysis of the ROK-family regulatory geneApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marina BorisovaDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Rosmarie GauppInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Saarland, Homburg, Saar, Saarland, Germany.
Amanda DuckworthDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alexander SchneiderDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Désirée DalüggeDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maraike MühleckDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Denise DeubelDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sandra UnsleberDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Wenqi YuDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Günther MuthDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus BischoffInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Saarland, Homburg, Saar, Saarland, Germany.
Friedrich GötzDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christoph MayerDepartment of Biology, Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany christoph.mayer@uni-tuebingen.de.
University of Tübingen · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptidoglycan recycling is a metabolic process by which Gram-negative bacteria reutilize up to half of their cell wall within one generation during vegetative growth. Whether peptidoglycan recycling also occurs in Gram-positive bacteria has so far remained unclear. We show here that three Gram-positive model organisms, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptomyces coelicolor, all recycle the sugar N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc) of their peptidoglycan during growth in rich medium. They possess MurNAc-6-phosphate (MurNAc-6P) etherase (MurQ in E. coli) enzymes, which are responsible for the intracellular conversion of MurNAc-6P to N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate and d-lactate. By applying mass spectrometry, we observed accumulation of MurNAc-6P in MurNAc-6P etherase deletion mutants but not in either the isogenic parental strains or complemented strains, suggesting that MurQ orthologs are required for the recycling of cell wall-derived MurNAc in these bacteria. Quantification of MurNAc-6P in ΔmurQ cells of S. aureus and B. subtilis revealed small amounts during exponential growth phase (0.19 nmol and 0.03 nmol, respectively, per ml of cells at an optical density at 600 nm [OD IMPORTANCE: The peptidoglycan of the bacterial cell wall is turned over steadily during growth. As peptidoglycan fragments were found in large amounts in spent medium of exponentially growing Gram-positive bacteria, their ability to recycle these fragments has been questioned. We conclusively showed recycling of the peptidoglycan component MurNAc in different Gram-positive model organisms and revealed that a MurNAc-6P etherase (MurQ or MurQ ortholog) enzyme is required in this process. We further demonstrated that recycling occurs predominantly during the transition to stationary phase in S. aureus and B. subtilis, explaining why peptidoglycan fragments are found in the medium during exponential growth. We quantified the intracellular accumulation of recycling products in MurNAc-6P etherase gene mutants, revealing that about 5% and 10% of the MurNAc of the cell wall per generation is recycled in S. aureus and B. subtilis, respectively. Importantly, we showed that MurNAc recycling and salvaging does not sustain growth in these bacteria but is used to enhance survival during late stationary phase.

Indexed as

Microbial ViabilityAcetylglucosamineBacillus subtilisCulture MediaGlycoside HydrolasesLactic AcidMass SpectrometryMuramic AcidsPeptidoglycanStaphylococcus aureusStreptomyces coelicolorAcetylglucosamineCulture MediaGlycoside HydrolasesLactic AcidMuramic AcidsN-acetylglucosamine 6-phosphateN-acetylmuramic acidPeptidoglycan

Identifiers

PMID27729505
PMCPMC5061867
OpenAlexW2531611286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.