Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729485›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2016

Anthropogenic transport of species across native ranges: unpredictable genetic and evolutionary consequences.

Jamie Hudson, Frédérique Viard, Charlotte Roby, Marc Rius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The reconstruction of invasion histories with genomic data in light of differing levels of anthropogenic transport.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamie HudsonOcean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK.
Frédérique ViardSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7144, Department 'Adaptation and Diversity in Marine Environment', Team Div&Co, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29682 Roscoff, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5603-9527
Charlotte RobySorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7144, Department 'Adaptation and Diversity in Marine Environment', Team Div&Co, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29682 Roscoff, France.
Marc RiusOcean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa m.rius@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2195-6605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities are responsible for the translocation of vast amounts of organisms, altering natural patterns of dispersal and gene flow. Most research to date has focused on the consequences of anthropogenic transportation of non-indigenous species within introduced ranges, with little research focusing on native species. Here, we compared genetic patterns of the sessile marine invertebrate, Ciona intestinalis, which has highly restricted dispersal capabilities. We collected individuals in a region of the species' native range where human activities that are known to facilitate the artificial spread of species are prevalent. Using microsatellite markers, we revealed highly dissimilar outcomes. First, we found low levels of genetic differentiation among sites separated by both short and large geographical distances, indicating the presence of anthropogenic transport of genotypes, and little influence of natural geographical barriers. Second, we found significant genetic differentiation in pairwise comparisons among certain sites, suggesting that other factors besides artificial transport (e.g. natural dispersal, premodern population structure) may be shaping genetic patterns. Taken together, we found dissimilar patterns of population structure in a highly urbanized region that could not be predicted by artificial transport alone. We conclude that anthropogenic activities alter genetic composition of native ranges, with unknown consequences for species' evolutionary trajectories.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimal DistributionAnimalsCiona intestinalisEnglandFranceGenotypeIntroduced SpeciesMicrosatellite Repeatsdispersal pathwayslarval transportpopulation connectivityrange shiftstunicates

Identifiers

PMID27729485
PMCPMC5095196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.