Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729397›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2016

The Evolution of Silicon Transport in Eukaryotes.

Alan O Marron, Sarah Ratcliffe, Glen L Wheeler, Raymond E Goldstein, Nicole King, Fabrice Not, Colomban de Vargas, Daniel J Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-option of Lysosomal Machinery for Sponge Biosilicification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Phylogenomic fingerprinting of tempo and functions of horizontal gene transfer within ochrophytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alan O MarronDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom am543@cam.ac.uk.
Sarah RatcliffeSchool of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Glen L WheelerMarine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Raymond E GoldsteinDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nicole KingHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Fabrice NotCNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, Roscoff, France.
Colomban de VargasCNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, Roscoff, France.
Daniel J RichterHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical InstituteWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosilicification (the formation of biological structures from silica) occurs in diverse eukaryotic lineages, plays a major role in global biogeochemical cycles, and has significant biotechnological applications. Silicon (Si) uptake is crucial for biosilicification, yet the evolutionary history of the transporters involved remains poorly known. Recent evidence suggests that the SIT family of Si transporters, initially identified in diatoms, may be widely distributed, with an extended family of related transporters (SIT-Ls) present in some nonsilicified organisms. Here, we identify SITs and SIT-Ls in a range of eukaryotes, including major silicified lineages (radiolarians and chrysophytes) and also bacterial SIT-Ls. Our evidence suggests that the symmetrical 10-transmembrane-domain SIT structure has independently evolved multiple times via duplication and fusion of 5-transmembrane-domain SIT-Ls. We also identify a second gene family, similar to the active Si transporter Lsi2, that is broadly distributed amongst siliceous and nonsiliceous eukaryotes. Our analyses resolve a distinct group of Lsi2-like genes, including plant and diatom Si-responsive genes, and sequences unique to siliceous sponges and choanoflagellates. The SIT/SIT-L and Lsi2 transporter families likely contribute to biosilicification in diverse lineages, indicating an ancient role for Si transport in eukaryotes. We propose that these Si transporters may have arisen initially to prevent Si toxicity in the high Si Precambrian oceans, with subsequent biologically induced reductions in Si concentrations of Phanerozoic seas leading to widespread losses of SIT, SIT-L, and Lsi2-like genes in diverse lineages. Thus, the origin and diversification of two independent Si transporter families both drove and were driven by ancient ocean Si levels.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBiological EvolutionBiological TransportCarrier ProteinsChoanoflagellataDiatomsEukaryotaEvolution, MolecularMembrane Transport ProteinsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Amino AcidSiliconCarrier ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsSiliconconvergent evolutioneukaryotesLsi2siliconSITtransporter.

Identifiers

PMID27729397
PMCPMC5100055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.