Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729395›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2016

In Planta Determination of the mRNA-Binding Proteome of Arabidopsis Etiolated Seedlings.

Marlene Reichel, Yalin Liao, Mandy Rettel, Chikako Ragan, Maurits Evers, Anne-Marie Alleaume, Rastislav Horos, Matthias W Hentze, Thomas Preiss, Anthony A Millar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The chloroplast RNA-binding protein CP29A supportsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marlene ReichelDivision of Plant Science, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4036-8657
Yalin LiaoEMBL-Australia Collaborating Group, Department of Genome Sciences, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3906-2420
Mandy RettelEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-3385
Chikako RaganEMBL-Australia Collaborating Group, Department of Genome Sciences, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0904-8460
Maurits EversEMBL-Australia Collaborating Group, Department of Genome Sciences, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
Anne-Marie AlleaumeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Rastislav HorosEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias W HentzeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-7876
Thomas PreissEMBL-Australia Collaborating Group, Department of Genome Sciences, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia tony.millar@anu.edu.au thomas.preiss@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6273-784X
Anthony A MillarDivision of Plant Science, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia tony.millar@anu.edu.au thomas.preiss@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6668-1326
Australian National University · AUEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA binding proteins (RBPs) control the fate and expression of a transcriptome. Despite this fundamental importance, our understanding of plant RBPs is rudimentary, being mainly derived via bioinformatic extrapolation from other kingdoms. Here, we adapted the mRNA-protein interactome capture method to investigate the RNA binding proteome in planta. From Arabidopsis thaliana etiolated seedlings, we captured more than 700 proteins, including 300 with high confidence that we have defined as the At-RBP set. Approximately 75% of these At-RBPs are bioinformatically linked with RNA biology, containing a diversity of canonical RNA binding domains (RBDs). As no prior experimental RNA binding evidence exists for the majority of these proteins, their capture now authenticates them as RBPs. Moreover, we identified protein families harboring emerging and potentially novel RBDs, including WHIRLY, LIM, ALBA, DUF1296, and YTH domain-containing proteins, the latter being homologous to animal RNA methylation readers. Other At-RBP set proteins include major signaling proteins, cytoskeleton-associated proteins, membrane transporters, and enzymes, suggesting the scope and function of RNA-protein interactions within a plant cell is much broader than previously appreciated. Therefore, our foundation data set has provided an unbiased insight into the RNA binding proteome of plants, on which future investigations into plant RBPs can be based.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsProteomeRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerSeedlingsArabidopsis ProteinsProteomeRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID27729395
PMCPMC5134986
OpenAlexW2531933060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.