ArticleTuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)2016
New directions using reporter enzyme fluorescence (REF) as a tuberculosis diagnostic platform.
Article in Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Stabilization of Tuberculosis Reporter Enzyme Fluorescence (REFtb) Diagnostic Reagents for Use at the Point of Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Improved Conventional and New Approaches in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Rapid Tuberculosis Diagnosis Using Reporter Enzyme Fluorescence.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Comparison of the Microwave-Heated Ziehl-Neelsen Stain and Conventional Ziehl-Neelsen Method in the Detection of Acid-Fast Bacilli in Lymph Node Biopsies.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Imaging Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mice with Reporter Enzyme Fluorescence.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Utility of Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction in DetectingBioMed research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in humans worldwide and diagnostic methods have been in place for more than 100 years, diagnosis remains a challenge. The main problems with diagnosis relate to the time needed to obtain a definitive result, difficulty in obtaining sputum, the primary clinical material used, and the ability of the causative agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, to cause disease in nearly any tissue within the body. In order to decrease incidence of TB, discovery of a novel interventions will be required, since current technologies have only been able to control numbers of infections, not reduce them. Diagnostic innovation is particularly needed because there are no effective pediatric or extrapulmonary TB diagnostic methods and multiple-drug resistance is only identified in less than 25% of those patients that are thought to have it. The most common diagnostic method worldwide remains acid-fast stain on sputum, with a threshold of ∼10,000 bacteria/ml that is only reached ∼5-6 months after development of symptoms. In order to obtain definitive diagnostic results earlier during the disease process, we have developed a diagnostic method designated reporter enzyme fluorescence (REF) that utilizes BlaC produced by M. tuberculosis and custom substrates to produce a specific fluorescent signal with as few as 10 bacteria/ml in clinical samples. We believe that the unique biology of the REF technique will allow it to contribute new diagnostic information that is complementary to all existing diagnostic tests as well as those currently known to be in development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.