Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729202›Full record

SynthesisParkinsonism & related disorders2016

Equating scores of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test and Sniffin' Sticks test in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Michael Lawton, Michele T M Hu, Fahd Baig, Claudio Ruffmann, Eilidh Barron, Diane M A Swallow, Naveed Malek, Katherine A Grosset, Nin Bajaj, Roger A Barker and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Sniffin Sticks Test performance in Parkinson's disease patients in different countries.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Tissue eosinophilia suggests dupilumab treatment response in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Altered network efficiency in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder: A multicentric study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cystic fibrosis-related chronic rhinosinusitis: the key role of a comprehensive evaluation in the era of highly effective modulator therapy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Olfactory Dysfunction in Huntington's Disease.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michael LawtonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Michael.Lawton@bristol.ac.uk.
Michele T M HuNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Parkinson's Disease Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Fahd BaigNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Parkinson's Disease Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Claudio RuffmannNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Parkinson's Disease Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eilidh BarronDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Diane M A SwallowDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Naveed MalekDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Katherine A GrossetDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nin BajajDepartment of Neurology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Roger A BarkerClinical Neurosciences, John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nigel WilliamsInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.
David J BurnInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Thomas FoltynieSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom.
Huw R MorrisDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom.
Nicholas W WoodDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom.
Margaret T MaySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Donald G GrossetDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Yoav Ben-ShlomoSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBCardiff University · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBSobell House · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0700943Medical Research Council G1100643Medical Research Council MC_PC_09003Parkinson's UK G-1107Parkinson's UK J-0901Parkinson's UK J-1101Parkinson's UK K-1501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpaired olfaction is an important feature in Parkinson's disease (PD) and other neurological diseases. A variety of smell identification tests exist such as "Sniffin' Sticks" and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). An important part of research is being able to replicate findings or combining studies in a meta-analysis. This is difficult if olfaction has been measured using different metrics. We present conversion methods between the: UPSIT, Sniffin' 16, and Brief-SIT (B-SIT); and Sniffin' 12 and Sniffin' 16 odour identification tests.

methodsWe used two incident cohorts of patients with PD who were tested with either the Sniffin' 16 (n = 1131) or UPSIT (n = 980) and a validation dataset of 128 individuals who took both tests. We used the equipercentile and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods to equate the olfaction scales.

resultsThe equipercentile conversion suggested some bias between UPSIT and Sniffin' 16 tests across the two groups. The IRT method shows very good characteristics between the true and converted Sniffin' 16 (delta mean = 0.14, median = 0) based on UPSIT. The equipercentile conversion between the Sniffin' 12 and 16 item worked well (delta mean = 0.01, median = 0). The UPSIT to B-SIT conversion showed evidence of bias but amongst PD cases worked well (mean delta = -0.08, median = 0).

conclusionWe have demonstrated that one can convert UPSIT to B-SIT or Sniffin' 16, and Sniffin' 12 to 16 scores in a valid way. This can facilitate direct comparison between tests aiding future collaborative analyses and evidence synthesis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdorantsOlfaction DisordersParkinson DiseaseReproducibility of ResultsSensory ThresholdsSmellEquatingItem Response TheoryOlfactionSniffin’ SticksUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test

Identifiers

PMID27729202
PMCPMC5159993
OpenAlexW2523415366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.