Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729022›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Pregnancy in patients with tuberculosis: a TBNET cross-sectional survey.

Graham H Bothamley, Cordula Ehlers, Irina Salonka, Alena Skrahina, Angels Orcau, Luigi R Codecasa, Maurizio Ferrarese, Dragica Pesut, Ivan Solovic, Andrii Dudnyk and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Tuberculosis in Pregnancy: Challenges of Immune Protection.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Tuberculosis in pregnancy.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Pregnancy and post-partum tuberculosis; a nationwide register-based case-control study, Denmark, 1990 to 2018.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tuberculosis in Pregnancy - a Summary.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Graham H BothamleyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Homerton University Hospital, London, E9 6SR, UK. graham.bothamley@homerton.nhs.uk.
Cordula EhlersTBNET Office, Centre for Research-Borstel, Borstel, Germany.
Irina SalonkaRepublican Research and Practical Centre for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.
Alena SkrahinaRepublican Research and Practical Centre for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus.
Angels OrcauAgència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luigi R CodecasaRegional TB Reference Centre, Villa Marelli Institute, Niguarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio FerrareseRegional TB Reference Centre, Villa Marelli Institute, Niguarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Dragica PesutUniversity of Belgrade School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ivan SolovicNational Institute for Tuberculosis, Pulmonary Disease and Thoracic Surgery Vyšné Hágy, Ruzomberok, Slovakia.
Andrii DudnykNational Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.
Luis AnibarroHospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.
Claudia DenkingerBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Lorenzo GuglielmettiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Inge MuylleUMC St. Pieter - CHU St. Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Marco ConfalonieriUniversity Hospital of Cattinara, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjectives: To determine whether the incidence of tuberculosis with pregnancy is more common than would be expected from the crude birth rate; to see whether there is significant delay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis during pregnancy.

methodDesign: A cross-sectional survey.

setting13 tuberculosis clinics within different European countries and the USA. POPULATION/SAMPLE: All patients with tuberculosis seen at these clinics for a period > 1 year. INSTRUMENT: Questionnaire survey based on continuous data collection.

main outcome measuresnumber and proportion of women with tuberculosis who were pregnant; timing of diagnosis in relation to pregnancy, including those who were pregnant or delivered in the 3 months prior to the diagnosis of TB and those who developed TB within 3 months after delivery.

resultsPregnancy occurred in 224 (1.5 %) of 15,217 TB patients and followed the expected rate predicted from the crude birth rate for the clinic populations. TB was diagnosed more commonly in the 3 months after delivery (n = 103) than during pregnancy (n = 68; χ

conclusionsTB is diagnosed more frequently after delivery, despite variations in local TB incidence and healthcare systems.

Indexed as

AdultBirth RateCross-Sectional StudiesDelayed DiagnosisEuropeFemaleHumansIncidencePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousTuberculosis, PulmonaryUnited StatesDiagnosisPostpartumPregnancyTBNETTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID27729022
PMCPMC5059923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.