ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016
Oral fosfomycin for treatment of urinary tract infection: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic strategies for multi-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Article
- Five-decade global expansion of Staphylococcus argenteus ST2250 shapes antimicrobial resistance dynamics.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Article
- Formulation, development and characterization of fosfomycin tromethamine pessaries for the treatment of vaginal infections.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Heteroresistance associated with the production of fosfomycin-resistant inner colonies during disk diffusion testing among a geographically diverse collection ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of fosfomycin-induced hypernatremia on patients' hospital stay length and survival.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- The Prevalence of Multidrug-ResistantIndian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Nitrofurantoin: properties and potential in treatment of urinary tract infection: a narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fosfomycin-Trometamol in Male Urinary Tract Infections with Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin: classic antibiotics and perspectives.The Journal of antibiotics · 2021Review
- Fosfomycin versus Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Lower UTI in Outpatients.Journal of laboratory physicians · 2021Article
- A Pattern of Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Negative Rods Causing Urinary Tract Infection in Adults.Cureus · 2021Article
- Unraveling Mechanisms and Epidemic Characteristics of Nitrofurantoin Resistance in UropathogenicInfection and drug resistance · 2021Article
- Effective Treatment for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections with Oral Fosfomycin, Single Center Four Year Retrospective Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Review
- Oral and Intravenous Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020Review
- Fosfomycin susceptibility of uropathogens at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFosfomycin is increasingly called upon for the treatment of multi drug-resistant (MDR) organisms causing urinary tract infection (UTI). We reviewed oral fosfomycin use for UTI treatment in a large UK hospital. The primary goal was to audit our clinical practice against current national guidelines. Secondary aims were to identify factors associated with treatment failure, and to investigate the potential for using fosfomycin in patients with co-morbidities.
methodsWe retrospectively studied 75 adult patients with UTI who received 151 episodes of treatment with fosfomycin from March 2013 to June 2015. We collected clinical data from our electronic patient record, and microbiology data pre- and post- fosfomycin treatment. We recorded additional data for patients receiving prolonged courses in order to make a preliminary assessment of safety and efficacy. We also reviewed >18,000 urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. processed by our laboratory over the final year of our study period to determine the prevalence of fosfomycin resistance.
resultsThere was a significant increase in fosfomycin treatment episodes over the course of the study period. Co-morbidities were present in 71 % of patients. The majority had E. coli infection (69 %), of which 59 % were extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producers. Klebsiella infections were more likely than E. coli to fail treatment, and more likely to be reported as fosfomycin resistant in cases of relapse following treatment. There were no adverse events in five patients treated with prolonged fosfomycin. Among all urinary isolates collected over a year, fosfomycin resistance was documented in 1 % of E. coli vs. 19 % of Klebsiella spp. (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsWe report an important role for oral fosfomycin for MDR UTI treatment in a UK hospital population, and based on the findings from this study, we present our own local guidelines for its use. We present preliminary data suggesting that fosfomycin is safe and effective for use in patients with complex comorbidities and over prolonged time periods, but may be less effective against Klebsiella than E. coli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.