Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27729010›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016

Significance of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 elevation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis.

P E Charles, R Noel, F Massin, J Guy, P E Bollaert, J P Quenot, S Gibot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Diagnostic Potential of Serum Interleukin-6 in Predicting Bacteremia in Adult Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P E CharlesService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Bocage Central, C.H.U. Dijon, 14 rue Gaffarel, 21000, Dijon, France. pierre-emmanuel.charles@chu-dijon.fr.
R NoelService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Bocage Central, C.H.U. Dijon, 14 rue Gaffarel, 21000, Dijon, France.
F MassinLaboratoire d'Immunologie, C.H.U. Brabois, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
J GuyLaboratoire d'Hématologie, Plateau Technique de Biologie, C.H.U. Dijon, Rue Angélique de Coudray, 21000, Dijon, France.
P E BollaertService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Central, C.H.U, 29 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54035, Nancy Cedex, France.
J P QuenotService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Bocage Central, C.H.U. Dijon, 14 rue Gaffarel, 21000, Dijon, France.
S GibotService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Central, C.H.U, 29 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54035, Nancy Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), early recognition of those with the highest risk of death is of paramount importance. Since clinical judgment is sometimes uncertain biomarkers could provide additional information likely to guide critical illness management. We evaluated the prognostic value of soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed by Myeloid cells 1 (sTREM-1), procalcitonin (PCT) and leucocyte surface expression of CD64.

methodsThis was a prospective cohort study, which included 190 septic patient admitted to the ICU in two hospitals. Blood samples for biomarker measurements were obtained upon admission and thereafter. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were calculated. The primary outcome was all-cause death in the ICU.

resultsThe mortality rate reached 25.8 %. The best predictive value of the three biomarkers was obtained with baseline sTREM-1, although clinical scores outperformed this. Accuracy was greater in patients without prior exposure to antibiotics and in those with proven bacterial infection. Adding sTREM-1 levels to SAPS II increased its specificity to 98 %. The soluble TREM-1 level, core temperature and SAPS II value were the only independent predictors of death after adjustment for potential confounders. A decrease in sTREM-1 with time was also more pronounced in survivors than in non-survivors.

conclusionssTREM-1 was found to be the best prognostic biomarker among those tested. Both baseline values and variations with time seemed relevant. Although SAPS II outperformed sTREM-1 regarding the prediction of ICU survival, the biomarker could provide additional information.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCalcitoninFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedMyeloid CellsPatient AdmissionPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesBiomarkersCalcitoninMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, IgGReceptors, ImmunologicTREM1 protein, humanTriggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1

Identifiers

PMID27729010
PMCPMC5059941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.