Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27728778›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cell2016

Comparative Principles of DNA Methylation Reprogramming during Human and Mouse In Vitro Primordial Germ Cell Specification.

Ferdinand von Meyenn, Rebecca V Berrens, Simon Andrews, Fátima Santos, Amanda J Collier, Felix Krueger, Rodrigo Osorno, Wendy Dean, Peter J Rugg-Gunn, Wolf Reik

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metabolic transitions define spermatogonial stem cell maturation.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The role of mtDNA in oocyte quality and embryo development.Molecular reproduction and development · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Current progress onFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ferdinand von MeyennEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK. Electronic address: vonmeyenn@babraham.ac.uk.
Rebecca V BerrensEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Simon AndrewsBioinformatics Group, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Fátima SantosEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Amanda J CollierEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Felix KruegerBioinformatics Group, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Rodrigo OsornoEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Wendy DeanEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Peter J Rugg-GunnEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Wolf ReikEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK. Electronic address: wolf.reik@babraham.ac.uk.
Babraham Institute · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K010867/1Medical Research Council MR/J003808/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095645/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 103060/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust WT093736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primordial germ cell (PGC) development is characterized by global epigenetic remodeling, which resets genomic potential and establishes an epigenetic ground state. Here we recapitulate PGC specification in vitro from naive embryonic stem cells and characterize the early events of epigenetic reprogramming during the formation of the human and mouse germline. Following rapid de novo DNA methylation during priming to epiblast-like cells, methylation is globally erased in PGC-like cells. Repressive chromatin marks (H3K9me2/3) and transposable elements are enriched at demethylation-resistant regions, while active chromatin marks (H3K4me3 or H3K27ac) are more prominent at regions that demethylate faster. The dynamics of specification and epigenetic reprogramming show species-specific differences, in particular markedly slower reprogramming kinetics in the human germline. Differences in developmental kinetics may be explained by differential regulation of epigenetic modifiers. Our work establishes a robust and faithful experimental system of the early events of epigenetic reprogramming and regulation in the germline.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody PatterningDNA MethylationDNA Transposable ElementsGerm CellsHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsTranscription, GeneticDNA Transposable ElementschromatinDNA methylationepigenetic reprogrammingepigenetic resettingPGCPGC-like cellPGC specificationpiRNAPiwi-interacting RNAprimordial germ cell

Identifiers

PMID27728778
PMCPMC5064768
OpenAlexW2530185749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.