Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27727496›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2017

Comparison of force fields for Alzheimer's A β42: A case study for intrinsically disordered proteins.

Martín Carballo-Pacheco, Birgit Strodel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Characterization of Amyloidogenic Peptide Aggregability in Helical Subspace.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martín Carballo-PachecoInstitute of Complex Systems, Structural Biochemistry (ICS-6), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52425, Germany.
Birgit StrodelInstitute of Complex Systems, Structural Biochemistry (ICS-6), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, 52425, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins are essential for biological processes such as cell signalling, but are also associated to devastating diseases including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease or type II diabetes. Because of their lack of a stable three-dimensional structure, molecular dynamics simulations are often used to obtain atomistic details that cannot be observed experimentally. The applicability of molecular dynamics simulations depends on the accuracy of the force field chosen to represent the underlying free energy surface of the system. Here, we use replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations to test five modern force fields, OPLS, AMBER99SB, AMBER99SB*ILDN, AMBER99SBILDN-NMR and CHARMM22*, in their ability to model Aβ

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseMolecular Dynamics SimulationAmyloid beta-PeptidesHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPeptide FragmentsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsPeptide FragmentsAlzheimer's diseaseamyloidforce fieldintrinsically disordered proteinmolecular dynamics simulation

Identifiers

PMID27727496
PMCPMC5275744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.