Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27727490›Full record

ArticleCancer science2017

Potential capacity of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in Japan.

Chisato Hamashima, Rei Goto

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05575765 (Clinical Validation of Multimodal Digestive Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05575765 suspendednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Validation of Multimodal Digestive Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Lesions

TypeobservationalSponsorXijing Hospital of Digestive DiseasesRan2022 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsColorectal Neoplasms, Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, Endoscopy, Digestive System, Molecular Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Difference in medical service use among Korean gastric cancer survivors according to regional healthcare vulnerabilities: a cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gastric Cancer Screening in Japan: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Geographic Variability of Gastric Cancer Incidence in Kazakhstan.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development and evaluation of a double-check support system using artificial intelligence in endoscopic screening for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chisato HamashimaDivision of Cancer Screening Assessment and Management, Center for Public Health Science, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Rei GotoGraduate School of Business Administration, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016, the Japanese government decided to introduce endoscopic screening for gastric cancer as a national program. To provide endoscopic screening nationwide, we estimated the proportion of increase in the number of endoscopic examinations with the introduction of endoscopic screening, based on a national survey. The total number of endoscopic examinations has increased, particularly in clinics. Based on the national survey, the total number of participants in gastric cancer screening was 3 784 967. If 30% of the participants are switched from radiographic screening to endoscopic screening, approximately 1 million additional endoscopic examinations are needed. In Japan, the participation rates in gastric cancer screening and the number of hospitals and clinics offering upper gastrointestinal endoscopy vary among the 47 prefectures. If the participation rates are high and the numbers of hospitals and clinics are small, the proportion of increase becomes larger. Based on the same assumption, 50% of big cities can provide endoscopic screening with a 5% increase in the total number of endoscopic examinations. However, 16.7% of the medical districts are available for endoscopic screening within a 5% increase in the total number of endoscopic examinations. Despite the Japanese government's decision to introduce endoscopic screening for gastric cancer nationwide, its immediate introduction remains difficult because of insufficient medical resources in rural areas. This implies that endoscopic screening will be initially introduced to big cities. To promote endoscopic screening for gastric cancer nationwide, the disparity of medical resources must first be resolved.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCitiesEarly Detection of CancerEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHealthcare DisparitiesHealth ResourcesHumansJapanMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsRural HealthStomach NeoplasmsCancer screeningcapacitygastric cancermedical resourceupper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID27727490
PMCPMC5276833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.