Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27727439›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in human genetics2016

Analysis of Heritability Using Genome-Wide Data.

Jacob B Hall, William S Bush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pharmacogenomic and Statistical Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob B HallInstitute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
William S BushInstitute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

Training Program in Quantitative Ocular GenomicsT32EY021453 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BRANTLEY, MILAM A, COX, NANCY J · 2011 to 2020
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY021453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most analyses of genome-wide association data consider each variant independently without considering or adjusting for the genetic background present in the rest of the genome. New approaches to genome analysis use representations of genomic sharing to better account for confounding factors like population stratification or to directly approximate heritability through the estimated sharing of individuals in a dataset. These approaches use mixed linear models, which relate genotypic sharing to phenotypic sharing, and rely on the efficient computation of genetic sharing among individuals in a dataset. This unit describes the principles and practical application of mixed models for the analysis of genome-wide association study data. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

HeredityLinear ModelsGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsGenotypeHumansPhenotypeGCTAheritabilitymixed-model analysis

Identifiers

PMID27727439
PMCPMC5127448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.