Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27726889›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2017

Trait liabilities and specific promotive processes in psychopathology: The example of suicidal behavior.

Jennifer M Buchman-Schmitt, Sarah J Brislin, Noah C Venables, Thomas E Joiner, Christopher J Patrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adolescents' Bipolar Experiences and Suicide Risk: Well-being and Mental Health Difficulties as Mediators.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Using a co-twin control design to evaluate alternative trait measures as indices of liability for substance use disorders.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer M Buchman-SchmittFlorida State University, United States. Electronic address: buchman@psy.fsu.edu.
Sarah J BrislinFlorida State University, United States.
Noah C VenablesFlorida State University, United States.
Thomas E JoinerFlorida State University, United States.
Christopher J PatrickFlorida State University, United States. Electronic address: cpatrick@psy.fsu.edu.

Funding

Integrated Clinical Neuroscience Training for Translational ResearchT32MH093311 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LISA A ECKEL, Pamela K. Keel · 2012 to 2026
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH093311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RDoC matrix framework calls for investigation of mental health problems through analysis of core biobehavioral processes quantified and studied across multiple domains of measurement. Critics have raised concerns about RDoC, including overemphasis on biological concepts/measures and disregard for the principle of multifinality, which holds that identical biological predispositions can give rise to differing behavioral outcomes. The current work illustrates an ontogenetic process approach to addressing these concerns, focusing on biobehavioral traits corresponding to RDoC constructs as predictors, and suicidal behavior as the outcome variable.

methodData were collected from a young adult sample (N=105), preselected to enhance rates of suicidality. Participants completed self-report measures of traits (threat sensitivity, response inhibition) and suicide-specific processes.

resultsWe show that previously reported associations for traits of threat sensitivity and weak inhibitory control with suicidal behavior are mediated by more specific suicide-promoting processes-namely, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide. LIMITATIONS: The sample was relatively small and the data were cross-sectional, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from the mediation analyses.

conclusionsGiven prior research documenting neurophysiological as well as psychological bases to these trait dispositions, the current work sets the stage for an intensive RDoC-oriented investigation of suicidal tendencies in which both traits and suicide-promoting processes are quantified using indicators from different domains of measurement. More broadly, this work illustrates how an RDoC research approach can contribute to a nuanced understanding of specific clinical problems, through consideration of how general biobehavioral liabilities interface with distinct problem-promoting processes.

Indexed as

Mental ProcessesPersonalityAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalInterpersonal RelationsMalePerceptionPsychopathologySocial AdjustmentSuicideYoung AdultDisinhibitionInterpersonal Theory of SuicideResearch Domain CriteriaSuicidal behaviorThreat sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID27726889
PMCPMC11973887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.