Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27726526›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2017

Long-term memory consolidation: The role of RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains.

Indulekha P Sudhakaran, Mani Ramaswami

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Role of CPEBs in Learning and Memory.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vectorial channeling as a mechanism for translational control by functional prions and condensates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Making of Long-Lasting Memories: A Fruit Fly Perspective.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. RNA NTrends in neurosciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Indulekha P Sudhakarana National Center for Biological Sciences , TIFR , Bangalore , India.
Mani Ramaswamia National Center for Biological Sciences , TIFR , Bangalore , India.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term and short-term memories differ primarily in the duration of their retention. At a molecular level, long-term memory (LTM) is distinguished from short-term memory (STM) by its requirement for new gene expression. In addition to transcription (nuclear gene expression) the translation of stored mRNAs is necessary for LTM formation. The mechanisms and functions for temporal and spatial regulation of mRNAs required for LTM is a major contemporary problem, of interest from molecular, cell biological, neurobiological and clinical perspectives. This review discusses primary evidence in support for translational regulatory events involved in LTM and a model in which different phases of translation underlie distinct phases of consolidation of memories. However, it focuses largely on mechanisms of memory persistence and the role of prion-like domains in this defining aspect of long-term memory. We consider primary evidence for the concept that Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation Element Binding (CPEB) protein enables the persistence of formed memories by transforming in prion-like manner from a soluble monomeric state to a self-perpetuating and persistent polymeric translationally active state required for maintaining persistent synaptic plasticity. We further discuss prion-like domains prevalent on several other RNA-binding proteins involved in neuronal translational control underlying LTM. Growing evidence indicates that such RNA regulatory proteins are components of mRNP (RiboNucleoProtein) granules. In these proteins, prion-like domains, being intrinsically disordered, could mediate weak transient interactions that allow the assembly of RNP granules, a source of silenced mRNAs whose translation is necessary for LTM. We consider the structural bases for RNA granules formation as well as functions of disordered domains and discuss how these complicate the interpretation of existing experimental data relevant to general mechanisms by which prion-domain containing RBPs function in synapse specific plasticity underlying LTM.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMemory ConsolidationMemory, Short-TermMicemRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPrion ProteinsProtein BiosynthesisProtein DomainsRibonucleoproteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerSynapsesTranscription FactorsCPEB1 protein, humanmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsPrion ProteinsRibonucleoproteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsCPEBlong term memorymRNP aggregationprion domainsRNA regulation

Identifiers

PMID27726526
PMCPMC5449092
OpenAlexW2531855873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.