Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27726093›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2017

A photodynamic bifunctional conjugate for prostate cancer: an in vitro mechanistic study.

Valentina Rapozzi, Greta Varchi, Emilia Della Pietra, Claudia Ferroni, Luigi E Xodo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina RapozziDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Piazzale Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. valentina.rapozzi@uniud.it.
Greta VarchiInstitute of Organic Synthesis and Photoreactivity, Italian National Research Council, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129, Bologna, Italy.
Emilia Della PietraDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Piazzale Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Claudia FerroniInstitute of Organic Synthesis and Photoreactivity, Italian National Research Council, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129, Bologna, Italy.
Luigi E XodoDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Piazzale Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · ITInstitute of Organic Synthesis and Photoreactivity · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has drawn considerable attention for its efficacy against certain types of cancers. It shows however limits in the case of deep cancers, favoring tumor recurrence under suboptimal conditions. More insight into the molecular mechanisms of PDT-induced cytotoxicity and cytoprotection is essential to extend and strengthen this therapeutic modality. As PDT induces iNOS/NO in both tumor and microenvironment, we examined the role of nitric oxide (NO) in cytotoxicity and cytoprotection. Our findings show that NO mediates its cellular effects by acting on the NF-κB/YY1/RKIP loop, which controls cell growth and apoptosis. The cytoprotective effect of PDT-induced NO is observed at low NO levels, which activate the pro-survival/anti-apoptotic NF-κB and YY1, while inhibiting the anti-survival/pro-apoptotic and metastasis suppressor RKIP. In contrast, high PDT-induced NO levels inhibit NF-κB and YY1 and induce RKIP, resulting in significant anti-tumor activity. These findings reveal a critical role played by NO in PDT and suggest that the use of bifunctional PDT agents composed of a photosensitizer and a NO-donor could enhance the photo-treatment effect. A successful application of NO in anticancer therapy requires control of its concentration in the target tissue. To address this issue we propose as PDT agent, a bimolecular conjugate called DR2, composed of a photosensitizer (Pheophorbide a) and a non-steroidal anti-androgen molecule capable of releasing NO under the exclusive control of light. The mechanism of action of DR2 in prostate cancer cells is reported and discussed.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalChlorophyllHumansMaleNF-kappa BNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsPhosphatidylethanolamine Binding ProteinPhotosensitizing AgentsProstatic NeoplasmsTriazenesYY1 Transcription Factor1-hydroxy-2-oxo-3,3-bis(2-aminoethyl)-1-triazeneChlorophyllNF-kappa BNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsPEBP1 protein, humanpheophorbide aPhosphatidylethanolamine Binding ProteinPhotosensitizing AgentsTriazenesYY1 protein, humanYY1 Transcription FactorCell tumor recurrenceDR2 conjugateNF-κB/YY1/RKIP loopNitric oxidePhotodynamic therapyProstate cancer cells

Identifiers

PMID27726093
OpenAlexW2531516346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.