ArticleAmerican journal of neurodegenerative disease2016
Chemical and neuropathological analyses of an Alzheimer's disease patient treated with solanezumab.
Article in American journal of neurodegenerative disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Recent Trends in Active and Passive Immunotherapies of Alzheimer's Disease.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review of Alzheimer's disease drugs and their relationship with neuron-glia interaction.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- A combined physiologically-based pharmacokinetic and quantitative systems pharmacology model for modeling amyloid aggregation in Alzheimer's disease.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023Article
- Alzheimer disease neuropathology in a patient previously treated with aducanumab.Acta neuropathologica · 2022Article
- Amyloid-β and α-Synuclein Immunotherapy: From Experimental Studies to Clinical Trials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Taxifolin: A Potential Therapeutic Agent for Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Development of a PET radioligand selective for cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Nuclear medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Vaccination against β-Amyloid as a Strategy for the Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease.Biology · 2020Review
- P450 Eicosanoids and Reactive Oxygen Species Interplay in Brain Injury and Neuroprotection.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBased on the amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, a series of clinical trials involving immunotherapies have been undertaken including infusion with the IgG1 monoclonal anti-Aβ antibody solanezumab directed against the middle of the soluble Aβ peptide. In this report, we give an account of the clinical history, psychometric testing, gross and microscopic neuropathology as well as immunochemical quantitation of soluble and insoluble Aβ peptides and other proteins of interest related to AD pathophysiology in a patient treated with solanezumab. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe solanezumab-treated AD case (SOLA-AD) was compared to non-demented control (NDC, n = 5) and non-immunized AD (NI-AD, n = 5) subjects. Brain sections were stained with H&E, Thioflavine-S, Campbell-Switzer and Gallyas methods. ELISA and Western blots were used for quantification of proteins of interest.
resultsThe SOLA-AD subject's neuropathology and biochemistry differed sharply from the NDC and NI-AD groups. The SOLA-AD case had copious numbers of amyloid laden blood vessels in all areas of the cerebral cortex, from leptomeningeal perforating arteries to arteriolar deposits which attained the cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) maximum score of 12. In contrast, the maximum CAA for the NI-AD cases averaged a total of 3.6, while the NDC cases only reached 0.75. The SOLA-AD subject had 4.4-fold more soluble Aβ40 and 5.6-fold more insoluble Aβ40 in the frontal lobe compared to NI-AD cases. In the temporal lobe of the SOLA-AD case, the soluble Aβ40 was 80-fold increased, and the insoluble Aβ40 was 13-fold more abundant compared to the non-immunized AD cases. Both soluble and insoluble Aβ42 levels were not dramatically different between the SOLA-AD and NI-AD cohort. DISCUSSION: Solanezumab immunotherapy provided no apparent relief in the clinical evolution of dementia in this particular AD patient, since there was a continuous cognitive deterioration and full expression of amyloid deposition and neuropathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27725918PMC5043095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.