Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27725895›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2016

Breast cancer molecular subtypes: from TNBC to QNBC.

Jane Date C Hon, Baljit Singh, Aysegul Sahin, Gang Du, Jinhua Wang, Vincent Y Wang, Fang-Ming Deng, David Y Zhang, Marie E Monaco, Peng Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Genomic Alterations in Quadruple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. ComparingCancers · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jane Date C HonDepartment of Pathology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Baljit SinghDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine New York, NY, USA.
Aysegul SahinDepartment of Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA.
Gang DuDepartment of Pediatrics, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA; Department of NYU Cancer Institute, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA.
Jinhua WangDepartment of Pediatrics, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA; Department of NYU Cancer Institute, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA.
Vincent Y WangAssociation of Chinese American Physicians Flushing, NY, USA.
Fang-Ming DengDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA; Association of Chinese American PhysiciansFlushing, NY, USA.
David Y ZhangAssociation of Chinese American Physicians Flushing, NY, USA.
Marie E MonacoDepartment of NYU Cancer Institute, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA; New York Harbor Healthcare SystemNew York, NY, USA.
Peng LeeDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA; Department of NYU Cancer Institute, New York University School of MedicineNew York, NY, USA; Association of Chinese American PhysiciansFlushing, NY, USA; New York Harbor Healthcare SystemNew York, NY, USA.
New York University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment protocols for breast cancer depend predominantly on receptor status with respect to estrogen (estrogen receptor alpha), progesterone (progesterone receptor) and human epidermal growth factor [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)]. The presence of one or more of these receptors suggests that a treatment targeting these pathways might be effective, while the absence of, or in the case of HER2, lack of overexpression of, all of these receptors, termed triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), indicates a need for the more toxic chemotherapy. In an effort to develop targeted therapies for TNBC, it will be necessary to differentiate among specific TNBC subtypes. The subset of TNBC that expresses androgen receptor (AR) has been determined to express genes consistent with a luminal subtype and therefore may be amenable to therapies targeting either AR, itself, or other pathways typical of a luminal subtype. Recent investigations of the AR signal pathway within breast cancer lead to AR as a significant target for breast cancer therapy with several clinical trials currently in progress. The subclass of TNBC that lacks AR, which we have termed quadruple negative breast cancer (QNBC) currently lacks a defined targetable pathway. Unlike AR-positive TNBC, QNBC predominantly exhibits a basal-like molecular subtype. Several subtypes and related pathway proteins are preferentially expressed in QNBC that may serve as effective targets for treatment, such as ACSL4, SKP2 and EGFR. ACSL4 expression has been demonstrated to be inversely correlated with expression of hormone/growth factor receptors and may thus serve as a biomarker for QNBC as well as a target for therapy. In the following review we summarize some of the current efforts to develop alternatives to chemotherapy for TNBC and QNBC.

Indexed as

ACSL4breast cancerQNBCquadruple negativeTNBC

Identifiers

PMID27725895
PMCPMC5043099
OpenAlexW2530991050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.