Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27725855›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2016

N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine inhibits the development of glucose intolerance and hepatic steatosis in diabetes-prone mice.

Alona Falach-Malik, Hava Rozenfeld, Moria Chetboun, Konstantin Rozenberg, Uriel Elyasiyan, Sanford R Sampson, Tovit Rosenzweig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current developments in nutrition · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alona Falach-MalikDepartment of Molecular Biology, Department of Nutritional Studies, Ariel UniversityIsrael; Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat-Gan, Israel.
Hava RozenfeldDepartment of Molecular Biology, Department of Nutritional Studies, Ariel UniversityIsrael; Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat-Gan, Israel.
Moria ChetbounDepartment of Molecular Biology, Department of Nutritional Studies, Ariel UniversityIsrael; Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat-Gan, Israel.
Konstantin RozenbergDepartment of Molecular Biology, Department of Nutritional Studies, Ariel University Israel.
Uriel ElyasiyanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Department of Nutritional Studies, Ariel University Israel.
Sanford R SampsonFaculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat-Gan, Israel; Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot, Israel.
Tovit RosenzweigDepartment of Molecular Biology, Department of Nutritional Studies, Ariel University Israel.
Bar-Ilan University · ILAriel University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxidative stress is associated with different pathological conditions, including glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes (T2D), however studies had failed to prove the benefits of antioxidants in T2D.

aimOn the assumption that the failure to demonstrate such anti-diabetic effects is a result of sub-optimal or excessive antioxidant dosage, we aimed to clarify the dose-response effect of the antioxidant N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine (NAC) on the progression of T2D in-vivo.

methodsExperiments were conducted on KK-Ay mice and HFD-fed mice given NAC at different concentrations (200-1800 and 60-600 mg/kg/day, respectively). Glucose and insulin tolerance tests were performed and plasma insulin and lipid peroxidation were measured. Insulin signaling pathway was followed in muscle and liver. Hepatic TG accumulation and mRNA expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism were measured.

resultsWhile 600-1800 mg/kg/day NAC all improved glucose tolerance in KK-Ay mice, only the 1200 mg/kg/day treatment increased insulin sensitivity. Hepatic function was not affected, however; microsteatosis rather than macrosteatosis was observed in NAC-treated mice compared to control. Glucose tolerance was improved in NAC-treated HFD-fed mice as well; the best results obtained with a dose of 400 mg NAC/kg/day. This was followed by lower weight gain and hepatic TG. Plasma lipid peroxidation was not correlated with the glucose-lowering effects of NAC in either model.

conclusionIdentification of the optimal dose of NAC and the population that would benefit the most from such intervention is essential in order to apply preventive and/or therapeutic use of NAC and similar agents in the future.

Indexed as

AntioxidantN-Acetyl-L-Cysteineoxidative stresssteatosistype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID27725855
PMCPMC5040673
OpenAlexW2533088028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.