Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27725815›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Resource Partitioning between Bacteria, Fungi, and Protists in the Detritusphere of an Agricultural Soil.

Susanne Kramer, Dörte Dibbern, Julia Moll, Maike Huenninghaus, Robert Koller, Dirk Krueger, Sven Marhan, Tim Urich, Tesfaye Wubet, Michael Bonkowski and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne KramerInstitute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim Stuttgart, Germany.
Dörte DibbernInstitute of Groundwater Ecology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health Neuherberg, Germany.
Julia MollDepartment of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-HalleHalle, Germany; Institute of Biology, University of LeipzigLeipzig, Germany.
Maike HuenninghausDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne Köln, Germany.
Robert KollerDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne Köln, Germany.
Dirk KruegerDepartment of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle Halle, Germany.
Sven MarhanInstitute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim Stuttgart, Germany.
Tim UrichDepartment of Bacterial Physiology, Institute for Microbiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald Greifswald, Germany.
Tesfaye WubetDepartment of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-HalleHalle, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv)Leipzig, Germany.
Michael BonkowskiDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne Köln, Germany.
François BuscotDepartment of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-HalleHalle, Germany; Institute of Biology, University of LeipzigLeipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv)Leipzig, Germany.
Tillmann LuedersInstitute of Groundwater Ecology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health Neuherberg, Germany.
Ellen KandelerInstitute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim Stuttgart, Germany.
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Hohenheim · DEInstitute of Groundwater Ecology · DELeipzig University · DEUniversität Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The flow of plant-derived carbon in soil is a key component of global carbon cycling. Conceptual models of trophic carbon fluxes in soil have assumed separate bacterial and fungal energy channels in the detritusphere, controlled by both substrate complexity and recalcitrance. However, detailed understanding of the key populations involved and niche-partitioning between them is limited. Here, a microcosm experiment was performed to trace the flow of detritusphere C from substrate analogs (glucose, cellulose) and plant biomass amendments (maize leaves, roots) in an agricultural soil. Carbon flow was traced by rRNA stable isotope probing and amplicon sequencing across three microbial kingdoms. Distinct lineages within the

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingenergy channelsplant litter decompositionrRNA-SIPstable isotope probing

Identifiers

PMID27725815
PMCPMC5035733
OpenAlexW2523654330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.