ArticleGlobal health action
Successes and challenges of north-south partnerships - key lessons from the African/Asian Regional Capacity Development projects.
Article in Global health action. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using starling murmuration as a model for creating a global health community of practice to advance equity in scholarship.Medical teacher · 2024Article
- Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Mentorship in health research institutions in Africa: A systematic review of approaches, benefits, successes, gaps and challenges.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- How international research consortia can strengthen organisations' research systems and promote a conducive environment and culture.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- A framework for sustainable capacity-building for collaborative North-South translational health research and training in a resource-constrained setting.Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- Co-constructing collaboration: An evidence-based approach to advance and evaluate equitable global public health research partnerships.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- International collaborative research, systems leadership and education: reflections from academic biomedical researchers in Africa.Frontiers in education · 2023Article
- Development of a community-based COVID-19 intervention in rural Ghana: a document analysis.BMC public health · 2022Review
- Enabling research capacity strengthening within a consortium context: a qualitative study.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Strengthening research capacity through an intensive training program for biomedical investigators from low- and middle-income countries: the Vanderbilt Institute for Research Development and Ethics (VIRDE).BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Consortium management structures, processes, and approaches: The DELTAS Africa example.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
- Factors associated with North-South research collaboration focusing on HIV/AIDS: lessons from ClinicalTrials.gov.AIDS research and therapy · 2021Article
- Building Capacity in Monitoring Urban Liveability in Bangkok: Critical Success Factors and Reflections from a Multi-Sectoral, International Partnership.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Building sustainable and consequential research capacity within a global alliance of paediatric surgical centres.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Article
- Managing health research capacity strengthening consortia: a systematised review of the published literature.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- Doctoral level research and training capacity in the social determinants of health at universities and higher education institutions in India, China, Oman and Vietnam: a survey of needs.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Understanding collaboration in a multi-national research capacity-building partnership: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2016Article
- Student experiences of participating in five collaborative blended learning courses in Africa and Asia: a survey.Global health actionArticle
- A partial economic evaluation of blended learning in teaching health research methods: a three-university collaboration in South Africa, Sweden, and Uganda.Global health actionArticle
- Distance- and blended-learning in global health research: potentials and challenges.Global health actionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIncreasing efforts are being made globally on capacity building. North-south research partnerships have contributed significantly to enhancing the research capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) over the past few decades; however, a lack of skilled researchers to inform health policy development persists, particularly in LMICs. The EU FP7 funded African/Asian Regional Capacity Development (ARCADE) projects were multi-partner consortia aimed to develop a new generation of highly trained researchers from universities across the globe, focusing on global health-related subjects: health systems and services research and research on social determinants of health. This article aims to outline the successes, challenges and lessons learned from the life course of the projects, focusing on the key outputs and experiences of developing and implementing these two projects together with sub-Saharan African, Asian and European institution partners.
designSixteen participants from 12 partner institutions were interviewed. The data were analysed using thematic content analysis, which resulted in four themes and three sub-categories. These data were complemented by a review of project reports.
resultsThe results indicated that the ARCADE projects have been successful in developing and delivering courses, and have reached over 920 postgraduate students. Some partners thought the north-south and south-south partnerships that evolved during the project were the main achievement. However, others found there to be a 'north-south divide' in certain aspects. Challenges included technical constraints and quality assurance. Additionally, adapting new teaching and learning methods into current university systems was challenging, combined with not being able to award students with credits for their degrees.
conclusionThe ARCADE projects were introduced as an innovative and ambitious project idea, although not designed appropriately for all partner institutions. Some challenges were underestimated from the beginning, and for such future projects, a more structured approach needs to be adopted. ARCADE partners learned that integrating courses into current university systems and awarding students credits are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.