Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27724976›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2016

Prehospital treatment with continuous positive airway pressure in patients with acute respiratory failure: a regional observational study.

Vibe Maria Laden Nielsen, Jacob Madsen, Anette Aasen, Anne Pernille Toft-Petersen, Kenneth Lübcke, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Erika Frischknecht Christensen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vibe Maria Laden NielsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. vibe.n@rn.dk.
Jacob MadsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anette AasenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne Pernille Toft-PetersenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Kenneth LübckePrehospital Emergency Medical Services, North Denmark Region, Aalborg, Denmark.
Bodil Steen RasmussenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Erika Frischknecht ChristensenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKNorth Denmark Region · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with acute respiratory failure are at risk of deterioration during prehospital transport. Ventilatory support with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can be initiated in the prehospital setting. The objective of the study is to evaluate adherence to treatment and effectiveness of CPAP as an addition to standard care.

methodsIn North Denmark Region, patients with acute respiratory failure, whom paramedics assessed as suffering from acute cardiopulmonary oedema, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma were treated with CPAP using 100 % O

resultsIn fourteen months, 171 patients were treated with CPAP (mean treatment time 35 ± 18 min). Adverse events were reported in 15 patients (9 %), hereof six discontinued CPAP due to hypotension, nausea or worsening dyspnoea. One serious adverse event was reported, a suspected pneumothorax treated adequately by an anaesthesiologist called from a mobile emergency care unit. Among CPAP patients, 45 (27 %) were admitted to an intensive care unit and 24 (14 %) died before hospital discharge. The non-CPAP group consisted of 739 patients. From arrival at scene to arrival at hospital, CPAP patients had a larger increase in SpO DISCUSSION: The study design reflects the daily prehospital working environment including long transport timesand paramedics educated in treating symptoms of acute respiratory failure, rather than treating one specific diagnosis. The study population was included consecutively and few patients were lost to follow-up. However, the study was too small to allow assessment of any effect of prehospital CPAP on mortality, nor could the effectiveness in specific disease conditions be examined.

conclusionsIn an emergency medical service including physician backup, adherence to CPAP treatment administered by paramedics was high and treatment was effective in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Indexed as

AmbulancesAgedAged, 80 and overContinuous Positive Airway PressureDenmarkEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRespiratory Distress SyndromeSurvival RateTime FactorsContinuous positive airway pressureCPAPDyspneaEmergency medical servicesNoninvasive ventilationParamedicPrehospitalRespiratory insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID27724976
PMCPMC5057371
OpenAlexW2530947041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.