Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27724951›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

The promise and the reality: a mental health workforce perspective on technology-enhanced youth mental health service delivery.

Simone Orlowski, Sharon Lawn, Ben Matthews, Anthony Venning, Kaisha Wyld, Gabrielle Jones, Megan Winsall, Gaston Antezana, Geoffrey Schrader, Niranjan Bidargaddi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Building EVA (Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychiatric Considerations of Infertility.Psychiatry investigation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Issues for eHealth in Psychiatry: Results of an Expert Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simone OrlowskiFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, FMC, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. simone.orlowski@flinders.edu.au.
Sharon LawnFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, FMC, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Ben MatthewsSchool of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
Anthony VenningFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, FMC, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Kaisha WyldFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, FMC, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Gabrielle JonesCountry and Outback Health, Kadina, Australia.
Megan WinsallFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, FMC, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Gaston AntezanaFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, FMC, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Geoffrey SchraderFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Margaret Tobin Centre, FMC, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Niranjan BidargaddiYoung and Well, Cooperative Research Centre, Abbotsford, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital technologies show promise for reversing poor engagement of youth (16-24 years) with mental health services. In particular, mobile and internet based applications with communication capabilities can augment face-to-face mental health service provision. The literature in this field, however, fails to adequately capture the perspectives of the youth mental health workforce regarding utility and acceptability of technology for this purpose.

methodsThis paper describes results of in-depth qualitative data drawn from various stakeholders involved in provision of youth mental health services in one Australian rural region. Data were obtained using focus groups and semi-structured interviews with regional youth mental health clinicians, youth workers and support/management staff (n = 4 focus groups; n = 8 interviews) and analysed via inductive thematic analysis.

resultsResults question the acceptability of technology to engage clients within youth mental health services. Six main themes were identified: young people in a digital age, personal connection, power and vulnerability, professional identity, individual factors and organisational legitimacy.

conclusionsThese findings deepen the understanding of risks and challenges faced when adopting new technologies in mental healthcare. Recommendations for technology design and implementation in mental health services are made.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelMedical InformaticsMental Health ServicesAdolescentAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Care SurveysHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental HealthRural Health ServicesDesignImplementationMental HealthRural YouthTechnology

Identifiers

PMID27724951
PMCPMC5057226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.