Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27723807›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Cold Water Fish Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering Application.

Hee Jeong Yoon, Su Ryon Shin, Jae Min Cha, Soo-Hong Lee, Jin-Hoi Kim, Jeong Tae Do, Hyuk Song, Hojae Bae

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Scaffolds Bioink for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hee Jeong YoonCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Bioindustrial Technologies, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Su Ryon ShinCenter for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.
Jae Min ChaMedical Device Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Hong LeeDepartment of Biomedical Science, CHA University, Bundang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Hoi KimCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Jeong Tae DoCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Hyuk SongCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Korea.
Hojae BaeCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Bioindustrial Technologies, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-4999
Konkuk University · KRBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCHA University · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) is a versatile biomaterial that has been used in various biomedical fields. Thus far, however, GelMA is mostly obtained from mammalian sources, which are associated with a risk of transmission of diseases, such as mad cow disease, as well as certain religious restrictions. In this study, we synthesized GelMA using fish-derived gelatin by a conventional GelMA synthesis method, and evaluated its physical properties and cell responses. The lower melting point of fish gelatin compared to porcine gelatin allowed larger-scale synthesis of GelMA and enabled hydrogel fabrication at room temperature. The properties (mechanical strength, water swelling degree and degradation rate) of fish GelMA differed from those of porcine GelMA, and could be tuned to suit diverse applications. Cells adhered, proliferated, and formed networks with surrounding cells on fish GelMA, and maintained high initial cell viability. These data suggest that fish GelMA could be utilized in a variety of biomedical fields as a substitute for mammalian-derived materials.

Indexed as

FishesMaterials TestingAnimalsGelatinHydrogelsMethacrylatesMiceNIH 3T3 CellsTissue EngineeringGelatinHydrogelsMethacrylatesmethacrylic acid

Identifiers

PMID27723807
PMCPMC5056724
OpenAlexW2531710393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.