Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27723795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

More than 50% of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Pet Dogs in Flagstaff, USA, Carry Toxigenic Genotypes.

Nathan E Stone, Lindsay C Sidak-Loftis, Jason W Sahl, Adam J Vazquez, Kristin B Wiggins, John D Gillece, Nathan D Hicks, James M Schupp, Joseph D Busch, Paul Keim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pangenome-GWAS analysis ofCanadian journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Culture-independent detection of low-abundantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification of novel, crypticMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular epidemiology ofFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan E StoneCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, United States of America.
Lindsay C Sidak-LoftisCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, United States of America.
Jason W SahlCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, United States of America.
Adam J VazquezCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, United States of America.
Kristin B WigginsTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, United States of America.
John D GilleceTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, United States of America.
Nathan D HicksTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, United States of America.
James M SchuppTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, United States of America.
Joseph D BuschCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, United States of America.
Paul KeimCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, United States of America.
David M WagnerCenter for Microbial Genetics and Genomics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, United States of America.
Northern Arizona University · USTranslational Genomics Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile is well documented, yet recent studies have highlighted the importance of community acquired infections and identified community associated reservoirs for this pathogen. Multiple studies have implicated companion pets and farm animals as possible sources of community acquired C. difficile infections in humans. To explore the potential role of pet dogs in human C. difficile infections we systematically collected canine fecal samples (n = 197) in Flagstaff, AZ. Additionally, nineteen fecal samples were collected at a local veterinary clinic from diarrheic dogs. We used these combined samples to investigate important questions regarding C. difficile colonization in pet canines: 1) What is the prevalence and diversity of C. difficile in this companion pet population, and 2) Do C. difficile isolates collected from canines genetically overlap with isolates that cause disease in humans? We used a two-step sequence typing approach, including multilocus sequence typing to determine the overall genetic diversity of C. difficile present in Flagstaff canines, and whole-genome sequencing to assess the fine-scale diversity patterns within identical multilocus sequence types from isolates obtained within and among multiple canine hosts. We detected C. difficile in 17% of the canine fecal samples with 10% containing toxigenic strains that are known to cause human disease. Sequencing analyses revealed similar genotypes in dogs and humans. These findings suggest that companion pets are a potential source of community acquired C. difficile infections in humans.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousGenotypeAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFecesHumansPetsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27723795
PMCPMC5056695
OpenAlexW2531684910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.