Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27723717›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2016

Activation of the ATR kinase by the RPA-binding protein ETAA1.

Peter Haahr, Saskia Hoffmann, Maxim A X Tollenaere, Teresa Ho, Luis Ignacio Toledo, Matthias Mann, Simon Bekker-Jensen, Markus Räschle, Niels Mailand

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Capturing ATR-ATRIP in the act of activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. RPA-independent activation of the ATR/CHK1 pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. DNA Damage and Replication Stress Checkpoints.Annual review of biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter HaahrThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Saskia HoffmannThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maxim A X TollenaereThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Teresa HoThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Luis Ignacio ToledoThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Matthias MannDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Simon Bekker-JensenThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus RäschleDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6737-7203
Niels MailandThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-709X
University of Copenhagen · DKMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of the ATR kinase following perturbations to DNA replication relies on a complex mechanism involving ATR recruitment to RPA-coated single-stranded DNA via its binding partner ATRIP and stimulation of ATR kinase activity by TopBP1. Here, we discovered an independent ATR activation pathway in vertebrates, mediated by the uncharacterized protein ETAA1 (Ewing's tumour-associated antigen 1). Human ETAA1 accumulates at DNA damage sites via dual RPA-binding motifs and promotes replication fork progression and integrity, ATR signalling and cell survival after genotoxic insults. Mechanistically, this requires a conserved domain in ETAA1 that potently and directly stimulates ATR kinase activity independently of TopBP1. Simultaneous loss of ETAA1 and TopBP1 gives rise to synthetic lethality characterized by massive genome instability and abrogation of ATR-dependent signalling. Our findings demonstrate that parallel TopBP1- and ETAA1-mediated pathways underlie ATR activation and that their combined action is essential for coping with replication stress.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntigens, SurfaceAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedHeLa CellsHumansNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntigens, SurfaceAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATRIP protein, humanATR protein, humanCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedETAA1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsTOPBP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27723717
OpenAlexW2531549933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.