ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2017
Fully automated, clinical-grade bone marrow processing: a single-centre experience.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing a fully automated and closed system process for red blood cell reduction of human bone marrow products.Cytotherapy · 2023Article
- Autologous blood derived cell therapy in maxillofacial bone graft surgery.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2021Article
- Autologous cord blood cell therapy for neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a pilot study for feasibility and safety.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Erythrocyte depletion from bone marrow: performance evaluation after 50 clinical-scale depletions with Spectra Optia BMC.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical grade processing of harvested bone marrow is required in various clinical situations, particularly in the management of ABO mismatching in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and in regenerative medicine. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe report a single-centre experience using a fully automated, clinical grade, closed system (Sepax, Biosafe, Switzerland). From 2003 to 2015, 125 procedures were performed in our laboratory, including buffy-coat production for HSCT (n=58), regenerative medicine in an orthopaedic setting (n=54) and density-gradient separation in a trial for treatment of critical limb ischaemia (n=13).
resultsBuffy coat separation resulted in a median volume reduction of 85% (range, 75-87%), providing satisfactory red blood cell depletion (69%, range 30-88%) and a median recovery of CD34 cells of 96% (range, 81-134%) in the setting of allogeneic HSCT. Significantly greater volume reduction (90%; range, 90-92%) and red blood cell depletion (88%; range, 80-93%) were achieved by the new SmartRedux software released for Sepax2, validated in the last eight allogeneic HSCT. The density gradient separation programme resulted in complete red blood cell depletion associated with high CD34 recovery (69%; range, 36-124%). No reactions related to the quality of the product were reported. Time to engraftment following allogeneic HSCT was in the normal range. No cases of microbiological contamination related to the manipulation were reported. DISCUSSION: Clinical grade, automated bone marrow manipulation with Sepax was shown to be effective, giving operator-independent results and could be used for a broad range of clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.