Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27723298›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2016

Parallelized Ligand Screening Using Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.

Yaewon Kim, Mengxiao Liu, Christian Hilty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. UltrasensitiveAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ultrafast Fragment Screening Using Photo-Hyperpolarized (CIDNP) NMR.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Inversion of HyperpolarizedThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
  12. Detection of Protein-Ligand Interactions byThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaewon KimDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843-3255, United States.
Mengxiao LiuDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843-3255, United States.
Christian HiltyDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843-3255, United States.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Development of Platform for Ligand Screening using Hyperpolarized NMRR21GM107927 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI HILTY, CHRISTIAN B. · 2013 to 2015
$534k
NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM107927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ligand interactions are frequently screened using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The dissociation constant (K

Indexed as

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularDrug DiscoveryLigandsProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID27723298
PMCPMC5464406
OpenAlexW2531491344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.