Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722996›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2017

Effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in clinical practice: comparison between anti-tumour necrosis factor-naïve and non-naïve patients.

Marisa Iborra, Javier Pérez-Gisbert, Marta Maia Bosca-Watts, Alicia López-García, Valle García-Sánchez, Antonio López-Sanromán, Esther Hinojosa, Lucía Márquez, Santiago García-López, María Chaparro and 18 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease.Precision clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Positioning biologics in the treatment of IBD: A practical guideCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Marisa IborraGastroenterology Department and CIBEREHD, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, no 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain. marisaiborra@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2416-3560
Javier Pérez-GisbertGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.
Marta Maia Bosca-WattsGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Valencia and INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Alicia López-GarcíaDepartamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Clinic i Provincial, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Valle García-SánchezHospital Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Antonio López-SanrománGastroenterology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Esther HinojosaServicio de Medicina Digestivo, Hospital de Manises, Valencia, Spain.
Lucía MárquezMetgessa adjunta. Servei de Digestiu, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago García-LópezDepartamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain.
María ChaparroHospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.
Montserrat AceitunoHospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Plaça Doctor Robert, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Margalida CalafatServei d'Aparell Digestiu, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi GuardiolaDigestive Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Blanca BellocHospital San Jorge Huesca, Avenida Martínez de Velasco 36, 22004, Huesca, Spain.
Yolanda BerMédico adjunto, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Lozano Blesa", IIS Aragón., CIBEREHD, Saragossa, Spain.
Luis BujandaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Donostia/Instituto Biodonostia, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain.
Belén BeltránGastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, CIBEREHD, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina Rodríguez-GutiérrezComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Jesús BarrioServicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, C/Dulzaina, no 2, 47012, Valladolid, Spain.
José Luis CabriadaHospital de Galdakao, Galdakao, Bilbao, Spain.
Montserrat RiveroHospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Raquel CamargoGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Manuel van DomselaarHospital Universitario de Torrejón, C/Mateo Inurria, s/n, 28850, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain.
Albert VilloriaServei de Malalties Digestives, Hospital Parc Tauli de Sabadell, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBEREHD-Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Hugo Salata SchutermanHospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Tenerife, Islas Canarias, Spain.
David HervásUnidad Bioestadística, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Pilar NosGastroenterology Department, CIBEREHD, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Spanish Working Group on Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU).
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital de Manises · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESMútua Terrassa · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Galdakao · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario de Torrejón · ESHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUlcerative colitis (UC) treatment is focused to achieve mucosal healing, avoiding disease progression. The study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of adalimumab (ADA) in UC and to identify predictors of remission to ADA.

methodsThis cohort study used data from the ENEIDA registry. Clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic remission, adverse events (AE), colectomy, and hospitalisations were evaluated; baseline characteristics and biological parameters were compared to determine predictors of response.

resultsWe included 263 patients (87 naïve and 176 previously exposed to anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha, TNF). After 12 weeks, clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission rates were 51, 26, and 14 %, respectively. The naïve group demonstrated better response to treatment than the anti-TNF-exposed group at short-term. Clinical and endoscopic remission within 1 year of treatment was better in the naïve group (65 vs. 49 and 50 vs. 35 %, respectively). The rates of AE, dose-escalation, hospitalisations, and colectomy during the first year were higher in anti-TNF-exposed patients (40, 43, and 27 % vs. 26, 21, and 11 %, respectively). Patients with primary failure and intolerance to the first anti-TNF and severe disease were associated with worse clinical response. Primary non-response to prior anti-TNF treatment and severe disease were predictive of poorer clinical remission. Low levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) at baseline were predictors of clinical remission.

conclusionsIn clinical practice, ADA was effective in UC, especially in anti-TNF naïve patients. FC and CRP could be predictors of treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsColectomyColitis, UlcerativeC-Reactive ProteinDisease ProgressionFecesFemaleHospitalizationHumansLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisAdalimumabAnti-Inflammatory AgentsC-Reactive ProteinLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdalimumabTreatmentUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID27722996
OpenAlexW4250816946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.