Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722995›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2017

Training Genetic Counsellors to Deliver an Innovative Therapeutic Intervention: their Views and Experience of Facilitating Multi-Family Discussion Groups.

Ivan Eisler, Frances Flinter, Jo Grey, Suzanne Hutchison, Carole Jackson, Louise Longworth, Rhona MacLeod, Marion McAllister, Alison Metcalfe, Christine Patch and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ivan EislerSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Frances FlinterGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jo GreyAssociation for Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Disorders (AMEND), London, UK.
Suzanne HutchisonSouth London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Carole JacksonKings College London, London, UK.
Louise LongworthBrunel University London, London, UK.
Rhona MacLeodCentral Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marion McAllisterCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Alison MetcalfeKings College London, London, UK. Alison.Metcalfe@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-918X
Christine PatchGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Buddug CopeGenetic Alliance UK, London, UK.
Glenn RobertKings College London, London, UK.
Emma RowlandKings College London, London, UK.
Fiona UlphUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1211-10015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovations in clinical genetics have increased diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of inherited genetic conditions (IGCs). This has led to an increased number of families seeking genetic testing and / or genetic counselling and increased the clinical load for genetic counsellors (GCs). Keeping pace with biomedical discoveries, interventions are required to support families to understand, communicate and cope with their Inherited Genetic Condition. The Socio-Psychological Research in Genomics (SPRinG) collaborative have developed a new intervention, based on multi-family discussion groups (MFDGs), to support families affected by IGCs and train GCs in its delivery. A potential challenge to implementing the intervention was whether GCs were willing and able to undergo the training to deliver the MFDG. In analysing three multi-perspective interviews with GCs, this paper evaluates the training received. Findings suggests that MFDGs are a potential valuable resource in supporting families to communicate genetic risk information and can enhance family function and emotional well-being. Furthermore, we demonstrate that it is feasible to train GCs in the delivery of the intervention and that it has the potential to be integrated into clinical practice. Its longer term implementation into routine clinical practice however relies on changes in both organisation of clinical genetics services and genetic counsellors' professional development.

Indexed as

FamilyGenetic Diseases, InbornCounselorsEducation, MedicalFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansFamily communicationGenetic counsellorsGenomicsInherited genetic conditionsMulti-family discussion groupsTherapeutic intervention

Identifiers

PMID27722995
PMCPMC5382180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.