Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722832›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2017

Risk factors for rotavirus infection in pigs in Busia and Teso subcounties, Western Kenya.

J O Amimo, T F Otieno, E Okoth, J O Onono, B Bett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J O AmimoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053, 00625, Nairobi, Kenya. amimo.josh@gmail.com.
T F OtienoInternational Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709-0100, Nairobi, Kenya.
E OkothInternational Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709-0100, Nairobi, Kenya.
J O OnonoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053, 00625, Nairobi, Kenya.
B BettInternational Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709-0100, Nairobi, Kenya. b.bett@cgiar.org.
International Livestock Research Institute · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analysed data that were previously collected for molecular characterisation of rotavirus (RV) groups A and C in pigs from Teso and Busia subcounties in Kenya to determine risk factors for its infection. The data included records from 239 randomly selected piglets aged between 1 and 6 months raised in free range and backyard production systems. RV infection was confirmed by screening of fresh faecal samples by using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); selected positive samples were subsequently sequenced and used for phylogenetic analysis. In this analysis, RV infection status was used as outcome variable, while the metadata collected at the time of sampling were used as predictors. A Bayesian hierarchical model which used integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) method was then fitted to the data. The model accounted for the spatial effect by using stochastic partial differential equations (SPDEs). Of the 239 samples screened, 206 were available for the analysis. Descriptive analyses showed that 27.7 % (57/206) of the samples were positive for rotaviruses groups A and C, 18.5 % were positive for group A rotaviruses, 5.3 % were positive for group C rotaviruses, while 3.9 % had co-infections from both groups of rotaviruses. The spatial effect was insignificant, and a simple (non-spatial) model showed that piglets (≤4 months) and those pigs kept in free range systems had higher risk of exposure to rotavirus infection as compared to older pigs (>4 months) and those tethered or housed, respectively. Intervention measures that will target these high-risk groups of pigs will be beneficial to farmers.

Indexed as

AnimalsBayes TheoremCoinfectionFecesKenyaModels, TheoreticalMultivariate AnalysisPhylogenyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk FactorsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesINLARisk factorsRotaviruses A and CSmallholder pigsWestern Kenya

Identifiers

PMID27722832
OpenAlexW2529443043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.