Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722805›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2017

Role of computed tomography at a cancer center emergency department.

Jessyca Couto Otoni, Julia Noschang, Thábata Yaedu Okamoto, Diego Rosseman Vieira, Michel Souto Mayor Petry, Lucas de Araujo Ramos, Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto Barbosa, Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt, Rubens Chojniak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Imaging of acute pelvic pain.The British journal of radiology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessyca Couto OtoniDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.
Julia NoschangDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.
Thábata Yaedu OkamotoDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.
Diego Rosseman VieiraDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.
Michel Souto Mayor PetryDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.
Lucas de Araujo RamosDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.
Paula Nicole Vieira Pinto BarbosaDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.
Almir Galvão Vieira BitencourtDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil. almir.bitencourt@accamargo.org.br.
Rubens ChojniakDepartment of Imaging, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antonio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, SP, 09015-010, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the imaging methods used at the emergency department (ED) of a cancer center, with emphasis on computed tomography (CT). A descriptive, retrospective, single-center study was conducted by reviewing imaging exams and medical records, after approval of the institution's Ethics Review Board. The demographic data, cancer history, and imaging exam requested were evaluated for all patients and the indications and results of head, chest, and abdominopelvic CT scans were also evaluated. During the study period, there were 8710 visits to the ED, and 5999 imaging studies were requested in 3788 patients (43.5 % of total of visits). One thousand eight hundred twenty-nine CT exams were used in 1121 visits (12.9 % of total of visits). The mean age of patients was 57.7 years and most patients (93.2 %) had a known primary tumor. The most common indications for abdominopelvic CT were non-oncologic emergencies (26.7 %) and postoperative complications (19.2 %), and the results were negative in 36.6 %, positive for clinical suspicion in 49.0 %, and incidental positive in 14.5 %. The most frequent indication for chest CT was suspected pulmonary embolism (34.4 %); however, only 11.1 % confirmed the diagnosis. The results of head TC were negative in 72.9 % and the indications that had more positive findings were suspected metastasis (32.1 %) and focal neurological sign/altered level of consciousness (24.5 %). CT plays an important role in driving the cancer patients visiting the ED. However, the high rate of negative or discordant results causes a concern for the inadvertent and excessive use of this imaging modality.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesEmergency Service, HospitalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsCancerComputed tomographyDiagnostic imagingEmergency department

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.