Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722239›Full record

ArticleChemical communications (Cambridge, England)2016

Development and substrate specificity screening of an in vivo biosensor for the detection of biomass derived aromatic chemical building blocks.

Leopoldo F M Machado, Neil Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing lignocellulosic conversion though biosensor-enabled metabolic engineering.Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. In vivo biosensors: mechanisms, development, and applications.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Tailor-made transcriptional biosensors for optimizing microbial cell factories.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leopoldo F M MachadoManchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. neil.dixon@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-7301
Neil DixonManchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. neil.dixon@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9065-6764

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017702/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring substrate and/or product concentration can create a major bottleneck for synthetic and biosynthetic processes. Here we report the development and substrate screening of a whole cell biosensor to detect biomass-derived aromatic chemical building blocks, supporting the use of sustainable feedstocks in the bulk and fine chemical industries.

Indexed as

BiomassAldehyde OxidoreductasesBenzene DerivativesBiosensing TechniquesCoumaric AcidsEscherichia coliGenetic VectorsPromoter Regions, GeneticSubstrate SpecificityAldehyde OxidoreductasesBenzene DerivativesCoumaric Acidsferulic acid

Identifiers

PMID27722239
PMCPMC5048394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.