Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722191›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology2016

The Pathogenesis of Resection-Associated Intestinal Adaptation.

Brad W Warner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brad W WarnerDivision of Pediatric Surgery, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Funding

ENTEROCYTE APOPTOSIS AFTER INTESTINAL RESECTIONR01DK059288 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WARNER, BRAD WAYNE · 2002 to 2011
$3.2M
INTESTINAL ADAPTATION AND EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTORR01DK053234 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WARNER, BRAD WAYNE · 1998 to 2006
$1.7M
ANGIOGENESIS IN INTESTINAL ADAPTATIONR01DK104698 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WARNER, BRAD WAYNE · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
Enterocyte Apoptosis after Intestinal ResectionR56DK059288 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WARNER, BRAD WAYNE · 2007 to 2007
$375k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK053234NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK059288NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104698NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK059288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After massive small-bowel resection, the remnant bowel compensates by a process termed

Indexed as

AbsorptionAdaptationAngiogenesisApoptosisEGF, epidermal growth factorEpitheliumGH, growth hormoneGLP-2, glucagon-like peptide-2Growth FactorsIGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1LA, lactate-accumulatorPN, parenteral nutritionProliferationRb, retinoblastoma proteinSBBO, small-bowel bacterial overgrowthSBR, small-bowel resectionVillus

Identifiers

PMID27722191
PMCPMC5042605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.