How to Make Feedback More Effective? Qualitative Findings from Pilot Testing of an Audit and Feedback Report for Endoscopists.

Fiona Webster, Jigisha Patel, Kathleen Rice, Nancy Baxter, Lawrence Paszat, Linda Rabeneck, Jill Tinmouth

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

An exploration into physician and surgeon data sensemaking: a qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
Pooled it
How well do critical care audit and feedback interventions adhere to best practice? Development and application of the REFLECT-52 evaluation tool.Implementation science : IS · 2021
Pooled it
Colonoscopy quality in community hospitals and nonhospital facilities in Korea.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2021
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fiona WebsterDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jigisha PatelSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Kathleen RiceDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Nancy BaxterDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Lawrence PaszatDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Linda RabeneckDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jill TinmouthDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0264-2176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

FeedbackMedical AuditQuality Indicators, Health CareColonoscopyGastroenterologistsHumansOntarioPilot ProjectsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID27722149

DOI10.1155/2016/4983790

PMCPMC5045985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.