Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722145›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer prevention2016

Diagnostic Value of Combining Tumor and Inflammatory Markers in Lung Cancer.

Ho Il Yoon, Oh-Ran Kwon, Kyung Nam Kang, Yong Sung Shin, Ho Sang Shin, Eun Hee Yeon, Keon Young Kwon, Ilseon Hwang, Yoon Kyung Jeon, Yongdai Kim and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer prevention, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Simple and robust polymer-based sensor for rapid cancer detection using serum.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ho Il YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Oh-Ran KwonBioInfra, Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Nam KangBioInfra, Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Yong Sung ShinBioInfra, Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Ho Sang ShinBioInfra, Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Eun Hee YeonBioInfra, Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Keon Young KwonDepartment of Pathology, Korea Regional Bank, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Ilseon HwangDepartment of Pathology, Korea Regional Bank, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Yoon Kyung JeonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yongdai KimDepartment of Statistics, College of Natural Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Chul Woo KimBioInfra, Inc., Seoul, Korea; Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University · KRKeimyung University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite major advances in lung cancer treatment, early detection remains the most promising way of improving outcomes. To detect lung cancer in earlier stages, many serum biomarkers have been tested. Unfortunately, no single biomarker can reliably detect lung cancer. We combined a set of 2 tumor markers and 4 inflammatory or metabolic markers and tried to validate the diagnostic performance in lung cancer.

methodsWe collected serum samples from 355 lung cancer patients and 590 control subjects and divided them into training and validation datasets. After measuring serum levels of 6 biomarkers (human epididymis secretory protein 4 [HE4], carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted [RANTES], apolipoprotein A2 [ApoA2], transthyretin [TTR], and secretory vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [sVCAM-1]), we tested various sets of biomarkers for their diagnostic performance in lung cancer.

resultsIn a training dataset, the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.821 for HE4, 0.753 for CEA, 0.858 for RANTES, 0.867 for ApoA2, 0.830 for TTR, and 0.552 for sVCAM-1. A model using all 6 biomarkers and age yielded an AUC value of 0.986 and sensitivity of 93.2% (cutoff at specificity 94%). Applying this model to the validation dataset showed similar results. The AUC value of the model was 0.988, with sensitivity of 93.33% and specificity of 92.00% at the same cutoff point used in the validation dataset. Analyses by stages and histologic subtypes all yielded similar results.

conclusionsCombining multiple tumor and systemic inflammatory markers proved to be a valid strategy in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Indexed as

BiomarkersLung neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27722145
PMCPMC5051593
OpenAlexW2527816747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.