Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27722088›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2016

Measurement of cortical thickness asymmetry in carotid occlusive disease.

Iris Asllani, Pamelia Slattery, Alexander Fafard, Marykay Pavol, Ronald M Lazar, Randolph S Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A cardiovascular-motor axis framework for perfusion-mediated motor impairment.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis - Hemodynamics (CREST-H): Study design and rationale.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iris AsllaniRochester Institute of Technology, New York, USA.
Pamelia SlatteryRochester Institute of Technology, New York, USA.
Alexander FafardRochester Institute of Technology, New York, USA.
Marykay PavolColumbia University Medical Center, USA.
Ronald M LazarColumbia University Medical Center, USA.
Randolph S MarshallColumbia University Medical Center, USA.

Funding

Blood Flow and Cognition in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery DiseaseR01NS076277 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LAZAR, RONALD M, MARSHALL, RANDOLPH S · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
New York Stroke Trials Network of Columbia and Cornell (NYCCSTN)U10NS086728 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARSHALL, RANDOLPH S · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076277NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS086728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being considered an important anatomical parameter directly related to neuronal density, cortical thickness is not routinely assessed in studies of the human brain

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArterial Occlusive DiseasesAtrophyCarotid Artery DiseasesCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexVisual CortexYoung AdultAtrophyCarotid diseaseCarotid occlusionCortical thicknessHigh-resolution MRIPrimary motor cortexPrimary visual cortex

Identifiers

PMID27722088
PMCPMC5050292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.