Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27721411›Full record

ArticleOncogene2017

Inhibition of Polo-like kinase 1 during the DNA damage response is mediated through loss of Aurora A recruitment by Bora.

W Bruinsma, M Aprelia, I García-Santisteban, J Kool, Y J Xu, R H Medema

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

W BruinsmaDepartment of Cell Biology and Cancer Genomics Center (CGC.nl), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-2979
M ApreliaDepartment of Cell Biology and Cancer Genomics Center (CGC.nl), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I García-SantistebanDepartment of Cell Biology and Cancer Genomics Center (CGC.nl), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J KoolDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Y J XuDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R H MedemaDepartment of Cell Biology and Cancer Genomics Center (CGC.nl), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When cells in G2 phase are challenged with DNA damage, several key mitotic regulators such as Cdk1/Cyclin B, Aurora A and Plk1 are inhibited to prevent entry into mitosis. Here we have studied how inhibition of Plk1 is established after DNA damage. Using a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensor for Plk1 activity, we show that inhibition of Plk1 after DNA damage occurs with relatively slow kinetics and is entirely dependent on loss of Plk1-T210 phosphorylation. As T210 is phosphorylated by the kinase Aurora A in conjunction with its co-factor Bora, we investigated how they are affected by DNA damage. Interestingly, we find that the interaction between Bora and Plk1 remains intact during the early phases of the DNA damage response (DDR), whereas Plk1 activity is already inhibited at this stage. Expression of an Aurora A mutant that is refractory to inhibition by the DDR failed to prevent inhibition of Plk1 and loss of T210 phosphorylation, suggesting that inhibition of Plk1 may be established by perturbing recruitment of Aurora A by Bora. Indeed, expression of a fusion in which Aurora A was directly coupled to Bora prevented DNA damage-induced inhibition of Plk1 activity, as well as inhibition of T210 phosphorylation. Taken together, these data demonstrate that DNA damage affects the function of Aurora A at multiple levels: both by direct inhibition of Aurora A activity, as well as by perturbing the interaction with its co-activator Bora. We propose that the DDR targets recruitment of Aurora A to the Plk1/Bora complex to prevent activation of Plk1 during DNA damage in G2.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAurora Kinase ACell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorEnzyme ActivationGene ExpressionHumansPhosphorylationPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein BindingProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsAurora Kinase Abora protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27721411
PMCPMC5378932
OpenAlexW2530831990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.