Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27721084›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2017

Homeostatic plasticity of excitability in crustacean central pattern generator networks.

David J Schulz, Brian J Lane

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Brain's Best Kept Secret Is Its Degenerate Structure.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adult spinal motoneurons change their neurotransmitter phenotype to control locomotion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David J SchulzDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA. Electronic address: schulzd@missouri.edu.
Brian J LaneDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Variability and Compensation in Reliable Neuronal NetworksR01MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1990 to 2025
$7.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasticity of excitability can come in two general forms: changes in excitability that alter neuronal output (e.g. long-term potentiation of intrinsic excitability) or excitability changes that stabilize neuronal output (homeostatic plasticity). Here we discuss the latter form of plasticity in the context of the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system, and a second central pattern generator circuit, the cardiac ganglion. We discuss this plasticity at three levels: rapid homeostatic changes in membrane conductance, longer-term effects of neuromodulation on excitability, and the impacts of activity-dependent feedback on steady-state channel mRNA levels. We then conclude with thoughts on the implications of plasticity of excitability for variability of conductance levels across populations of motor neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Pattern GeneratorsCrustaceaHomeostasisMotor NeuronsNerve NetNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID27721084
PMCPMC5382137
OpenAlexW2529150811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.