Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27720619›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

A Surveillance System Ensures Crossover Formation in C. elegans.

Tyler S Machovina, Rana Mainpal, Anahita Daryabeigi, Olivia McGovern, Dimitra Paouneskou, Sara Labella, Monique Zetka, Verena Jantsch, Judith L Yanowitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structure and function of the synaptonemal complex.The Journal of cell biology · 2026
    Review
  4. High-resolution global recombination mapping inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Expanding thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tyler S MachovinaMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Rana MainpalMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Anahita DaryabeigiMax F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Olivia McGovernMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Dimitra PaouneskouMax F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Sara LabellaDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada.
Monique ZetkaDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada.
Verena JantschMax F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Judith L YanowitzMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: jly@alum.mit.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Vienna · ATMcGill University · CA

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Undergraduate Summer Research Supplement for 5R01GM104007-07: Characterization of a Meiotic Crossover Surveillance SystemR01GM104007 · NIGMS · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI YANOWITZ, JUDITH L · 2013 to 2021
$2.6M
COELOMOCYTES IN C.ELEGANS--CELL FATE DETERMINATIONF32HD008715 · NICHD · CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. · PI YANOWITZ, JUDITH L · 2000 to 2002
$112k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD008715NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104007NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crossover (CO) recombination creates a physical connection between homologs that promotes their proper segregation at meiosis I (MI). Failure to realize an obligate CO causes homologs to attach independently to the MI spindle and separate randomly, leading to nondisjunction. However, mechanisms that determine whether homolog pairs have received crossovers remain mysterious. Here we describe a surveillance system in C. elegans that monitors recombination intermediates and couples their formation to meiotic progression. Recombination intermediates are required to activate the system, which then delays further processing if crossover precursors are lacking on even one chromosome. The synaptonemal complex, a specialized, proteinaceous structure connecting homologous chromosomes, is stabilized in cis on chromosomes that receive a crossover and is destabilized on those lacking crossovers, a process that is dependent on the function of the polo-like kinase PLK-2. These results reveal a new layer of communication between crossover-committed intermediates and the synaptonemal complex that functions as a cis-acting, obligate, crossover-counting mechanism.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCrossing Over, GeneticSynaptonemal ComplexC. eleganscheckpointcosa-1germlinehim-5meiosisplk-2SUN-1synapsissynaptonemal complex

Identifiers

PMID27720619
PMCPMC5104180
OpenAlexW2527944647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.