Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27720186›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Role of Soft-Tissue Heterogeneity in Computational Models of Deep Brain Stimulation.

Bryan Howell, Cameron C McIntyre

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation evokes two distinct cortical responses via differential white matter activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. StimVision v2: Examples and Applications in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effect of Biophysical Model Complexity on Predictions of Volume of Tissue Activated (VTA) during Deep Brain Stimulation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Biophysical reconstruction of the signal conduction underlying short-latency cortical evoked potentials generated by subthalamic deep brain stimulation.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryan HowellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cameron C McIntyreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: ccm4@case.edu.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Tractography-Activation Models for Neuropsychiatric Deep StimulationR01MH102238 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCINTYRE, CAMERON · 2014 to 2025
$4.5M
Pathway targeted deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's diseaseR01NS085188 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAREL, NOAM, MCINTYRE, CAMERON · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Computational models of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulationF32NS096839 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HOWELL, BRYAN · 2016 to 2018
$164k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102238NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS096839NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBioelectric field models of deep brain stimulation (DBS) are commonly utilized in research and industrial applications. However, the wide range of different representations used for the human head in these models may be responsible for substantial variance in the stimulation predictions.

objectiveDetermine the relative error of ignoring cerebral vasculature and soft-tissue heterogeneity outside of the brain in computational models of DBS.

methodsWe used a detailed atlas of the human head, coupled to magnetic resonance imaging data, to construct a range of subthalamic DBS volume conductor models. We incrementally simplified the most detailed base model and quantified changes in the stimulation thresholds for direct activation of corticofugal axons.

resultsIgnoring cerebral vasculature altered predictions of stimulation thresholds by <10%, whereas ignoring soft-tissue heterogeneity outside of the brain altered predictions between -44 % and 174%.

conclusionsHeterogeneity in the soft tissues of the head, if unaccounted for, introduces a degree of uncertainty in predicting electrical stimulation of neural elements that is not negligible and thereby warrants consideration in future modeling studies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalAxonsBrainDeep Brain StimulationElectric StimulationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSubthalamic NucleusDeep brain stimulationElectric fieldHeterogeneitySoft tissuesVasculature

Identifiers

PMID27720186
PMCPMC5241242
OpenAlexW2518421972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.