Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27720028›Full record

ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2016

A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds.

P M Down, A J Bradley, J E Breen, W J Browne, T Kypraios, M J Green

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P M DownUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: peter.down@nottingham.ac.uk.
A J BradleyUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom; Quality Milk Management Services Ltd, Cedar Barn, Easton Hill, Easton, Wells BA5 1DU, United Kingdom.
J E BreenUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom; Quality Milk Management Services Ltd, Cedar Barn, Easton Hill, Easton, Wells BA5 1DU, United Kingdom.
W J BrowneGraduate School of Education and Centre for Multilevel modelling, University of Bristol, 35 Berkeley Square, Bristol BS8 1JA, United Kingdom.
T KypraiosUniversity of Nottingham, School of Mathematical Sciences, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
M J GreenUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance of the dry period with respect to mastitis control is now well established although the precise interventions that reduce the risk of acquiring intramammary infections during this time are not clearly understood. There are very few intervention studies that have measured the clinical efficacy of specific mastitis interventions within a cost-effectiveness framework so there remains a large degree of uncertainty about the impact of a specific intervention and its costeffectiveness. The aim of this study was to use a Bayesian framework to investigate the cost-effectiveness of mastitis controls during the dry period. Data were assimilated from 77 UK dairy farms that participated in a British national mastitis control programme during 2009-2012 in which the majority of intramammary infections were acquired during the dry period. The data consisted of clinical mastitis (CM) and somatic cell count (SCC) records, herd management practices and details of interventions that were implemented by the farmer as part of the control plan. The outcomes used to measure the effectiveness of the interventions were i) changes in the incidence rate of clinical mastitis during the first 30days after calving and ii) the rate at which cows gained new infections during the dry period (measured by SCC changes across the dry period from <200,000cells/ml to >200,000cells/ml). A Bayesian one-step microsimulation model was constructed such that posterior predictions from the model incorporated uncertainty in all parameters. The incremental net benefit was calculated across 10,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations, to estimate the cost-benefit (and associated uncertainty) of each mastitis intervention. Interventions identified as being cost-effective in most circumstances included selecting dry-cow therapy at the cow level, dry-cow rations formulated by a qualified nutritionist, use of individual calving pens, first milking cows within 24h of calving and spreading bedding evenly in dry-cow yards. The results of this study highlighted the efficacy of specific mastitis interventions in UK conditions which, when incorporated into a costeffectiveness framework, can be used to optimize decision making in mastitis control. This intervention study provides an example of how an intuitive and clinically useful Bayesian approach can be used to form the basis of an on-farm decision support tool.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingLactationAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleFemaleMastitis, BovineModels, StatisticalUnited KingdomBayesianCost-effectivenessDairy cowDecision makingDry-periodMastitis control

Identifiers

PMID27720028
PMCPMC5073076
OpenAlexW2520005123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.